Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation

被引:255
作者
Vines, Bradley W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cerruti, Carlo [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Schlaug, Gottfried [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychiat, Inst Mental Hlth, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[4] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2202-9-103
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique that has been found to modulate the excitability of neurons in the brain. The polarity of the current applied to the scalp determines the effects of tDCS on the underlying tissue: anodal tDCS increases excitability, whereas cathodal tDCS decreases excitability. Research has shown that applying anodal tDCS to the non-dominant motor cortex can improve motor performance for the non-dominant hand, presumably by means of changes in synaptic plasticity between neurons. Our previous studies also suggest that applying cathodal tDCS over the dominant motor cortex can improve performance for the non-dominant hand; this effect may result from modulating inhibitory projections (interhemispheric inhibition) between the motor cortices of the two hemispheres. We hypothesized that stimultaneously applying cathodal tDCS over the dominant motor cortex and anodal tDCS over the non-dominant motor cortex would have a greater effect on finger sequence performance for the non-dominant hand, compared to stimulating only the non-dominant motor cortex. Sixteen right-handed participants underwent three stimulation conditions: 1) dual-hemisphere - with anodal tDCS over the non-dominant motor cortex, and cathodal tDCS over the dominant motor cortex, 2) uni-hemisphere - with anodal tDCS over the non-dominant motor cortex, and 3) sham tDCS. Participants performed a finger-sequencing task with the non-dominant hand before and after each stimulation. The dependent variable was the percentage of change in performance, comparing pre- and post-tDCS scores. Results: A repeated measures ANOVA yielded a significant effect of tDCS condition (F(2,30) = 4.468, p = .037). Post-hoc analyses revealed that dual-hemisphere stimulation improved performance significantly more than both uni-hemisphere (p = .021) and sham stimulation (p = .041). Conclusion: We propose that simultaneously applying cathodal tDCS over the dominant motor cortex and anodal tDCS over the non-dominant motor cortex produced an additive effect, which facilitated motor performance in the non-dominant hand. These findings are relevant to motor skill learning and to research studies of motor recovery after stroke.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation [J].
Boggio, Paulo S. ;
Castro, Leticia O. ;
Savagim, Edna A. ;
Braite, Renata ;
Cruz, Viviane C. ;
Rocha, Renata R. ;
Rigonatti, Sergio P. ;
Silva, Maria T. A. ;
Fregni, Felipe .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2006, 404 (1-2) :232-236
[2]   The functional neuroanatomy of simple and complex sequential finger movements: a PET study [J].
Catalan, MJ ;
Honda, M ;
Weeks, RA ;
Cohen, LG ;
Hallett, M .
BRAIN, 1998, 121 :253-264
[3]   INTERHEMISPHERIC INHIBITION OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX [J].
FERBERT, A ;
PRIORI, A ;
ROTHWELL, JC ;
DAY, BL ;
COLEBATCH, JG ;
MARSDEN, CD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1992, 453 :525-546
[4]  
FLOEL A, 2008, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V69, P32
[5]   Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients [J].
Fregni, F ;
Boggio, PS ;
Mansur, CG ;
Wagner, T ;
Ferreira, MJL ;
Lima, MC ;
Rigonatti, SP ;
Marcolin, MA ;
Freedman, SD ;
Nitsche, MA ;
Pascual-Leone, A .
NEUROREPORT, 2005, 16 (14) :1551-1555
[6]   Transcranial DC stimulation (OCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation [J].
Gandiga, PC ;
Hummel, FC ;
Cohen, LG .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (04) :845-850
[7]   Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning [J].
Garry, MI ;
Kamen, G ;
Nordstrom, MA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 91 (04) :1570-1578
[8]   Interhemispheric effects of high and low frequency rTMS in healthy humans [J].
Gorsler, A ;
Bäumer, T ;
Weiller, C ;
Münchau, A ;
Liepert, J .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 114 (10) :1800-1807
[9]  
Hesse S, 2007, RESTOR NEUROL NEUROS, V25, P9
[10]   CEREBRAL LOCATION OF INTERNATIONAL 10-20 SYSTEM ELECTRODE PLACEMENT [J].
HOMAN, RW ;
HERMAN, J ;
PURDY, P .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 66 (04) :376-382