Cytogenetics, molecular and ultrastructural characteristics of biphenotypic acute leukemia identified by the EGIL scoring system

被引:73
作者
Owaidah, TM
Beihany, AA
Iqbal, MA
Elkum, N
Roberts, GT
机构
[1] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Sci Comp, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
关键词
biphenotypic; leukemia; immunophenotyping; cytogenetic; molecular;
D O I
10.1038/sj.leu.2404128
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Biphenotypic acute leukemia (BAL) is a rare, difficult to diagnose entity. Its identification is important for risk stratification in acute leukemia (AL). The scoring proposal of the European Group for the Classification of Acute Leukemia (EGIL) is useful for this purpose, but its performance against objective benchmarks is unclear. Using the EGIL system, we identified 23 (3.4%) BAL from among 676 newly diagnosed AL patients. Mixed, small and large blast cells predominated, with FAB M2 and L1 constituting the majority. All patients were positive for myeloid (M) markers and either B cell (B) (17 or 74%) or T cell (T) (8 or 34%) markers with two exceptional patients demonstrating trilineage phenotype. Six (50%) of studied M-B cases were positive for both IGH and TCR. In six (26%) patients myeloid lineage commitment was also demonstrable by electron cytochemistry. Abnormal findings were present in 19 (83%) patients by cytogenetics/FISH/molecular analysis as follows: t(9; 22) (17%); MLL gene rearrangement (26%); deletion(6q) (13%); 12p11.2 (9%); numerical abnormalities (13%), and three (13%) new, previously unreported translocations t(X; 6)(p22.3; q21); t(2; 6)(q37; p21.3); and t(8; 14)(p21; q32). In conclusion, the EGIL criteria for BAL appear robust when compared against molecular techniques that, if applied routinely, could aid in detecting BAL and help in risk stratification.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 626
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Trisomy 4 as the sole karyotypic abnormality in a case of acute biphenotypic leukemia with T-lineage markers in minimally differentiated acute myelocytic leukemia [J].
Al-Qurashi, FH ;
Owaidah, T ;
Iqbal, MA ;
Aljurf, M .
CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 2004, 150 (01) :66-69
[2]  
ALTMAN AJ, 1990, AM J PEDIAT HEMATOL, V12, P123
[3]   Revised guideline on immunophenotyping in acute leukaemias and chronic lymphoproliferative disorders [J].
Bain, BJ ;
Barnett, D ;
Linch, D ;
Matutes, E ;
Reilly, JT .
CLINICAL AND LABORATORY HAEMATOLOGY, 2002, 24 (01) :1-13
[4]  
BENE MC, 1995, LEUKEMIA, V9, P1783
[5]  
BRIGAUDAU C, 1998, ATLAS GENET CYTOGENE
[6]  
Brumpt C, 2000, BLOOD, V96, P2254
[7]  
BUCCHERI V, 1993, LEUKEMIA, V7, P919
[8]  
Carbonell F, 1996, LEUKEMIA, V10, P1283
[9]   HUMAN T-CELL GAMMA-GENES ARE FREQUENTLY REARRANGED IN B-LINEAGE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIAS BUT NOT IN CHRONIC B-CELL PROLIFERATIONS [J].
CHEN, Z ;
LEPASLIER, D ;
DAUSSET, J ;
DEGOS, L ;
FLANDRIN, G ;
COHEN, D ;
SIGAUX, F .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1987, 165 (04) :1000-1015
[10]   ACUTE BIPHENOTYPIC LEUKEMIA - IMMUNOPHENOTYPIC AND CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS [J].
HANSON, CA ;
ABAZA, M ;
SHELDON, S ;
ROSS, CW ;
SCHNITZER, B ;
STOOLMAN, LM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1993, 84 (01) :49-60