The evolution of ureteroscopy: A modern single-institution series

被引:47
作者
Krambeck, AE [1 ]
Murat, FJ [1 ]
Gettman, MT [1 ]
Chow, GK [1 ]
Paterson, DE [1 ]
Segura, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4065/81.4.468
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a modern ureteroscopy series, Including the use of new technological advances, operative procedures, and potential complications, at a single institution and to compare our current experience with our prior published series and the current literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive ureteroscopies performed in 961 patients from December 1999 to February 2003 at our Institution. RESULTS: Semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes were used in 60.3% and 37.0% of the cases, respectively. In 2.6% of cases, a combination of both rigid and flexible ureteroscopes was required. The most common Indications for ureteroscopy were as follows: stone, 57.9%; diagnostic, 20.6%; and urothellal carcinoma, 12.6%. Of the stones treated, 31.8% were proximal or middle and 59.1% distal. The overall, proximal, and distal stone-free rates were 91.7%, 87.3%, and 94.2%, respectively. Average operative time was 81 minutes (range, 5-280 minutes). Average follow-up was 2.36 months (range, 1-24 months). The overall complication rate was 1.9% (18/961), including a 0.2% (2/961) incidence of ureteral strictures. CONCLUSION: Current practice trends have shifted to an Increased use of flexible ureteroscopes; and more frequent ureteroscopic treatment of proximal calculi. Our single treatment stone-free rates are competitive with quoted shock wave lithotripsy success. In addition, there has been a decrease In ureteroscopic-associated complications in our series, with no ureteral avulsions. The improvements In treatment success and decrease In complications may be secondary to advances in ureteroscopic technology.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 473
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   URETEROSCOPY [J].
BLUTE, ML ;
SEGURA, JW ;
PATTERSON, DE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 139 (03) :510-512
[2]   Ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: A multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled study assessing pain, outcomes and complications [J].
Borboroglu, PG ;
Amling, CL ;
Schenkman, NS ;
Monga, M ;
Ward, JF ;
Piper, NY ;
Bishoff, JT ;
Kane, CJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) :1651-1657
[3]   Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary after ureteroscopy and ureteropyeloscopy: A randomized trial [J].
Byrne, RR ;
Auge, BK ;
Kourambas, J ;
Munver, R ;
Delvecchio, F ;
Preminger, GM .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2002, 16 (01) :9-13
[4]   Optimal treatment for distal ureteral calculi: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy [J].
Chang, CP ;
Huang, SH ;
Tai, HL ;
Wang, BF ;
Yen, MY ;
Huang, KH ;
Jiang, HJ ;
Lin, J .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2001, 15 (06) :563-566
[5]   Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective, randomized controlled trial [J].
Chen, YT ;
Chen, J ;
Wong, WY ;
Yang, SSD ;
Hsieh, CH ;
Wang, CC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (05) :1977-1980
[6]   Outpatient ureteroscopy: Predictive factors for postoperative events [J].
Cheung, MC ;
Lee, F ;
Leung, YL ;
Wong, BBW ;
Chu, SM ;
Tam, PC .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) :914-918
[7]   Outpatient holmium laser lithotripsy using semirigid ureteroscope - Is the treatment outcome affected by stone load? [J].
Cheung, MC ;
Lee, F ;
Yip, SKH ;
Tam, PC .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 39 (06) :702-708
[8]   Ureteroscopy: Effect of technology and technique on clinical practice [J].
Chow, GK ;
Patterson, DE ;
Blute, ML ;
Segura, JW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (01) :99-102
[9]   A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nonstented versus stented ureteroscopic lithotripsy [J].
Denstedt, JD ;
Wollin, TA ;
Sofer, M ;
Nott, L ;
Weir, M ;
Honey, RJD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (05) :1419-1422
[10]   The Dretler stone cone: A device to prevent ureteral stone migration-the initial clinical experience [J].
Desai, MR ;
Patel, SB ;
Desai, MM ;
Kukreja, R ;
Sabnis, RB ;
Desai, RM ;
Patel, SH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (05) :1985-1988