The recovery of cognitive function after general anesthesia in elderly patients: A comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane

被引:120
作者
Chen, XG
Zhao, MX
White, PF
Li, ST
Tang, J
Wender, RH
Sloninsky, A
Naruse, R
Kariger, R
Webb, T
Norel, E
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200112000-00029
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We evaluated the cognitive recovery profiles in elderly patients after general anesthesia with desflurane or sevoflurane. After IRB approval, 70 ASA physical status I-III consenting elderly patients (greater than or equal to 65 yr old) undergoing total knee or hip replacement procedures were randomly assigned to one of two general anesthetic groups. Propofol and fentanyl were administered for induction of anesthesia, followed by either desflurane 2%-4% or sevoflurane 1%-1.5% with nitrous oxide 65% in oxygen. The desflurane (2.5 +/- 0.6 MAC . h) and sevoflurane (2.7 +/- 0.5 MAC - h) concentrations were adjusted to maintain comparable depths of hypnosis using the electroencephalogram bispectral index monitor. The Mini-Mental State (MMS) test was used to assess cognitive function preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3,6, and 24-h intervals. The use of desflurane was associated with a more rapid emergence from anesthesia (6.3 +/- 2.4 min versus 8.0 +/- 2.8 min) and a shorter length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (213 +/- 66 min versus 241 +/- 87 min). However, there were no significant differences between the Desflurane and the Sevoflurane groups when the MMS scores were compared preoperatively, and postoperatively at 1, 3,6, and 24 h. Compared with the preoperative (baseline) MMS scores, the values were significantly decreased at 1 h postoperatively (27.8 +/- 1.7 versus 29.5 +/- 0.5 in the Desflurane group, and 27.4 +/- 1.7 versus 29.2 +/- 1.0 in the Sevoflurane group, respectively). However, the MMS scores returned to preoperative baseline levels within 6 h after surgery. At 1 h and 3 h after surgery, 51% and 11% (versus 57% and 9%) of patients in the Desflurane (versus Sevoflurane) Group experienced cognitive impairment. In conclusion, desflurane is associated with a faster early recovery than sevoflurane after general anesthesia in elderly patients. However, recovery of cognitive function was similar after desflurane and sevoflurane-based anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:1489 / 1494
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Cognitive dysfunction 1-2 years after non-cardiac surgery in the elderly [J].
Abildstrom, H ;
Rasmussen, LS ;
Rentowl, P ;
Hanning, CD ;
Rasmussen, H ;
Kristensen, PA ;
Moller, JT .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (10) :1246-1251
[2]   LIMITS OF THE MINI-MENTAL STATE AS A SCREENING-TEST FOR DEMENTIA AND DELIRIUM AMONG HOSPITAL PATIENTS [J].
ANTHONY, JC ;
LERESCHE, L ;
NIAZ, U ;
VONKORFF, MR ;
FOLSTEIN, MF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1982, 12 (02) :397-408
[3]   The recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-nitrous oxide anesthesia is faster than after an isoflurane-nitrous oxide-fentanyl combination in elderly patients [J].
Bekker, AY ;
Berklayd, P ;
Osborn, I ;
Bloom, M ;
Yarmush, J ;
Turndorf, H .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (01) :117-122
[4]   MENTAL FUNCTION AND MORBIDITY AFTER ACUTE HIP-SURGERY DURING SPINAL AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
BIGLER, D ;
ADELHOJ, B ;
PETRING, OU ;
PEDERSON, NO ;
BUSCH, P ;
KALHKE, P .
ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 40 (07) :672-676
[5]   GENERAL OR SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - WHICH IS BETTER IN THE ELDERLY [J].
CHUNG, F ;
MEIER, R ;
LAUTENSCHLAGER, E ;
CARMICHAEL, FJ ;
CHUNG, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (03) :422-427
[6]  
CHUNG F, 1990, ANESTH ANALG, V71, P217
[7]   PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF HALOTHANE AND ISOFLURANE ANESTHESIA [J].
DAVISON, LA ;
STEINHELBER, JC ;
EGER, EI ;
STEVENS, WC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1975, 43 (03) :313-324
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE MENTAL FUNCTION [J].
DRUMMOND, GB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1975, 47 (02) :130-142
[9]  
DUCKWORTH GS, 1976, P ONT PSYCHOGERIATRI, P54
[10]  
EDWARDS H, 1981, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V245, P1342, DOI 10.1001/jama.245.13.1342