Hyperthermia as an adjuvant to radiation therapy of recurrent or metastatic malignant melanoma. A multicentre randomized trial by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology

被引:193
作者
Overgaard, J
Gonzalez, DG
Hulshof, MCCH
Arcangeli, G
Dahl, O
Mella, O
Bentzen, SM
机构
[1] AARHUS UNIV HOSP,DEPT ONCOL,DK-8000 AARHUS,DENMARK
[2] UNIV AMSTERDAM,ACAD MED CTR,DEPT RADIOTHERAPY,1105 AZ AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[3] G PORFIRI ONCOL CTR,DEPT RADIOTHERAPY,LATINA,ITALY
[4] HAUKELAND HOSP,DEPT ONCOL,N-5021 BERGEN,NORWAY
关键词
malignant melanoma; hyperthermia; radiotherapy; randomized multicentre trial; local control; survival; thermometry; quality assurance;
D O I
10.3109/02656739609023685
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The ESHO protocol 3-85 is a multicentre randomized trial investigating the value of hyperthermia as an adjuvant to radiotherapy in treatment of malignant melanoma. A total of 134 metastatic of recurrent malignant melanoma lesions in 70 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone (3 fractions in 8 days) or each fraction followed by hyperthermia (aimed for 43 degrees C for 60 min). Radiation was given with high voltage photons or electrons. Tumours were stratified according to institution and size (above or below 4 cm) and randomly assigned to a total radiation dose of either 24 or 27 Gy to be given with or without hyperthermia. The endpoint was persistent complete response in the treated area. A number of 128 tumours in 68 patients were evaluable, with an observation time between 3 and 72 months. Sixty-five tumours were randomized to radiation alone and 63 to radiation + heat. Sixty received 24 Gy and 68 tumours received 27 Gy, respectively. Size was less than or equal to 4 cm in 81 and >4 cm in 47 tumours. Overall the 2-year actuarial local tumour control was 37%. Univariate analysis showed prognostic influence of hyperthermia (rad alone 28% versus rad + heat 46%, p = 0.008) and radiation dose (24 Gy 25% versus 27 Gy 56%, p = 0.02), but not of tumour size (small 42% versus large 29%, p = 0.21). A Cox multivariate regression analysis showed the most important prognostic parameters to be: hyperthermia (odds ratio: 1.73 (1.07-2.78), p = 0.02), tumour size (odds ratio: 0.91 (0.85-0.99), p = 0.05) and radiation dose (odds ratio: 1.17 (1.01-1.36), p = 0.05). Analysis of the heating quality showed a significant relationship between the extent of heating and local tumour response. Addition of heat did not significantly increase the acute or late radiation reactions. The overall 5-year survival rate of the patients was 19%, but 38% in patients if all known disease was controlled, compared to 8% in the patients with persistent active disease.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 20
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1978, 29 ICRU
[2]   HYPERTHERMIA TRIALS [J].
ARCANGELI, G ;
OVERGAARD, J ;
GONZALEZGONZALEZ, D ;
SHRIVASTAVA, PN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1988, 14 :S93-S109
[3]  
ARCANGELI G, 1987, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V60, P950, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19870901)60:5<950::AID-CNCR2820600506>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-Z
[5]   CLINICAL RADIOBIOLOGY OF MALIGNANT-MELANOMA [J].
BENTZEN, SM ;
OVERGAARD, J ;
THAMES, HD ;
OVERGAARD, M ;
HANSEN, PV ;
VONDERMAASE, H ;
MEDER, J .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1989, 16 (03) :169-182
[6]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN METASTATIC MALIGNANT-MELANOMA TREATED WITH COMBINED RADIATION-THERAPY AND HYPERTHERMIA [J].
BENYOSEF, R ;
KAPP, DS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 1993, 9 (06) :767-781
[7]   CORRELATION OF THERMAL PARAMETERS WITH OUTCOME IN COMBINED RADIATION THERAPY-HYPERTHERMIA TRIALS [J].
COX, RS ;
KAPP, DS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 1992, 8 (06) :719-732
[8]  
CURRAN WJ, 1992, RAD RES 20 CENTURY P, P883
[9]   ARRHENIUS RELATIONSHIPS FROM THE MOLECULE AND CELL TO THE CLINIC [J].
DEWEY, WC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 1994, 10 (04) :457-483
[10]   INTERSOCIETY COUNCIL ON RADIATION ONCOLOGY ESSAY ON THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW MEDICAL TREATMENTS INTO PRACTICE [J].
DEWHIRST, MW ;
GRIFFIN, TW ;
SMITH, AR ;
PARKER, RG ;
HANKS, GE ;
BRADY, LW .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (12) :951-957