Evaluation of inverse algorithms in the analysis of magnetic flux leakage data

被引:19
作者
Haueisen, J [1 ]
Unger, R
Beuker, T
Bellemann, ME
机构
[1] Friedrich Schiller Univ, Biomagnet Ctr, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] H ROSEN Engn Ltd, R&D Dept, D-49811 Lingen, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci, Dept Biomed Engn, D-07745 Jena, Germany
关键词
inverse problems; magnetic flux leakage; nondestructive testing; pipeline inspection;
D O I
10.1109/20.999121
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We evaluate the use of linear and nonlinear inverse algorithms (maximum entropy method, low resolution electromagnetic tomography, L-1 and L-2 norm methods) in the analysis of magnetic flux leakage (MFL) measurements commonly used for the detection of flaws and irregularities in gas and oil pipelines. We employed MFL data from a pipe with well-defined artificial surface breaking flaws at the internal and external wall. Except for the low-resolution electromagnetic tomography, all algorithms show, on average, similar accuracy in the flaw extent estimation. Maximum entropy and the L-1 norm have a tendency to yield better results for smaller flaws, while the L-2 norm performs slightly better for larger flaws. The errors of the flaw location estimation are comparable for the maximum entropy and the L-2 norm algorithm. The L-1 norm performs worse for those flaws situated on the internal pipe wall. Linear methods (L-2 norm) are easier to implement and require less computation time than nonlinear methods (maximum entropy method, L-1 norm). In conclusion, inverse algorithms potentially provide a powerful means for the detection and characterization of flaws in MFL data.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1488
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Image reconstruction of spherical inclusions in ferromagnetic structures using the generalized inverse [J].
Bruno, AC ;
Miranda, LC ;
Barbosa, CH ;
Lima', EA ;
Kuhner, GS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1998, 34 (05) :2912-2915
[2]   Imaging flaws in magnetically permeable structures using the truncated generalized inverse on leakage fields [J].
Bruno, AC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1997, 82 (12) :5899-5906
[3]  
Craik D., 1995, MAGNETISM PRINCIPLES
[4]   THE MAGNETIC LEAKAGE FIELD OF SURFACE-BREAKING CRACKS [J].
EDWARDS, C ;
PALMER, SB .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 1986, 19 (04) :657-673
[5]  
FOERSTER F, 1986, NDT INT, V19, P3
[6]  
FOERSTER F, 1982, DEFEKTOSKOPIYA, V18, P3
[7]  
FOERSTER F, 1985, MATER EVAL, V43, P1154
[8]   Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions [J].
Fuchs, M ;
Wagner, M ;
Köhler, T ;
Wischmann, HA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 16 (03) :267-295
[9]   An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling [J].
Fuchs, M ;
Drenckhahn, R ;
Wischmann, HA ;
Wagner, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 45 (08) :980-997
[10]  
Hanasaki K., 1996, First US-Japan Symposium on Advances in NDT, P183