Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low-performing schools to attract and retain high-quality teachers?

被引:95
作者
Clotfelter, CT [1 ]
Ladd, HF
Vigdor, JL
Diaz, RA
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/pam.20003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Administrative data from North Carolina are used to explore the extent to which that state's relatively sophisticated school-based accountability system has exacerbated the challenges that schools serving low-performing students face in retaining and attracting high-quality teachers. Most clear are the adverse effects on retention rates, and hence on teacher turnover, in such schools. Less clear is the extent to which that higher turnover has translated into a decline in the average qualifications of the teachers in the low-performing schools. Other states with more primitive accountability systems can expect even greater adverse effects on teacher turnover in low-performing schools. (C) 2004 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 271
页数:21
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, DIG ED STAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPERS ED
[3]  
BRIDGES EM, 1996, NEW HDB TEACHER EVAL, P147
[4]  
CLOTFELTER C, 2003, N CAROLINA LAW REV, V81, P1463
[5]  
CLOTFELTER C, 2002, AM EC ASS M ATL GEOR
[6]  
Clotfelter CT, 1996, Holding Schools Accountable: Performance-Based Reform in Education, P23
[7]  
Darling-Hammond L., 2000, ED POLICY ANAL ARCH, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.14507/EPAA.V8N1.2000
[8]  
Elmore R.F., 1996, HOLDING SCH ACCOUNTA, P65
[9]  
*GOV ED 1 TASK FOR, 2002, LETS FIN JOB
[10]   Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update [J].
Hanushek, EA .
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 1997, 19 (02) :141-164