Mapping the English and Chinese Versions of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General to the EQ-5D Utility Index

被引:52
作者
Cheung, Yin-Bun [1 ]
Thumboo, Julian [2 ]
Gao, Fei [3 ]
Ng, Gim-Yew [3 ]
Pang, Grace [3 ]
Koo, Wen-Hsin [3 ]
Sethi, Vijay-Kumar [3 ]
Wee, Joseph [3 ]
Goh, Cynthia [3 ]
机构
[1] CTERU, Singapore 169039, Singapore
[2] Singapore Gen Hosp, Singapore 0316, Singapore
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cancer; EQ-5D; FACT-G; quality of life; utility; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE; SOCIAL PREFERENCE WEIGHTS; SELF-REPORT QUESTIONNAIRE; LUNG HEALTH STATES; RHEUMATIC-DISEASES; POPULATION; SF-12; RELIABILITY; SINGAPORE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00448.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study aims to develop a function for mapping the English and Chinese versions of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scores to the EuroQoL Group's EQ-5D utility index and to test whether a single function is sufficient for the two language versions. A baseline survey of 558 cancer patients in Singapore using the FACT-G and EQ-5D was conducted (308 English and 250 Chinese questionnaires). Regression models were used to predict the EQ-5D utility index values based on the FACT-G scores and thus derive a mapping equation. Data from a follow-up survey of the patients were used to validate the results. The FACT-G Social/Family scale was not associated with the EQ-5D utility index (P = 0.701). There was no interaction between language version and the predictors (each P > 0.1). An equation that maps the FACT-G Physical, Emotional, and Functional well-being scales to the EQ-5D utility index was derived. In the validation sample, the mean observed utility values was larger than the mapped by only 0.005 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.006 to 0.016), but the mean absolute difference was 0.083 (95% CI 0.076 to 0.090). At the group level, but not individual level, the equation developed can accurately map the English and Chinese versions of the FACT-G scores to the EQ-5D utility index.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 376
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Performance status score: do patients and their oncologists agree? [J].
Blagden, SP ;
Charman, SC ;
Sharples, LD ;
Magee, LRA ;
Gilligan, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (06) :1022-1027
[2]   Mapping oral health related quality of life to generic health state values [J].
Brennan, David S. ;
Spencer, A. John .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 6 (1)
[3]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579
[4]   Variability and sample size requirements of quality-of-life measures: A randomized study of three major questionnaires [J].
Cheung, YB ;
Goh, C ;
Thumboo, J ;
Khoo, KS ;
Wee, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (22) :4936-4944
[5]   The equivalence and difference between the English and Chinese versions of two major, cancer-specific, health-related quality-of-life questionnaires [J].
Cheung, YB ;
Thumboo, J ;
Goh, C ;
Khoo, KS ;
Che, W ;
Wee, J .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (12) :2874-2880
[6]  
Cheung YB, 2003, ANN ACAD MED SINGAP, V32, P376
[7]   Variation in the estimation of quality-adjusted life-years by different preference-based instruments [J].
Conner-Spady, B ;
Suarez-Almazor, ME .
MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (07) :791-801
[8]   Estimation of patient preference-based utility weights from the functional assessment of cancer therapy - General [J].
Dobrez, Deborah ;
Cella, David ;
Pickard, A. Simon ;
Lai, Jin-Shei ;
Nickolov, Angel .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (04) :266-272
[9]   Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states [J].
Dolan, P .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (11) :1095-1108
[10]  
GAO F, 2008, J CLIN EPIDEMIO 0709