Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation ln locally advanced rectal cancer: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

被引:361
作者
Janjan, NA
Khoo, VS
Abbruzzese, J
Pazdur, R
Dubrow, R
Cleary, KR
Allen, PK
Lynch, PM
Glober, G
Wolff, R
Rich, TA
Skibber, J
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Digest Dis, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Univ Virginia, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[8] Univ Texas, Div Radiotherapy, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1999年 / 44卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00099-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the rates of tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTX/XRT) that delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2)/day) was given to 117 patients. The pretreatment stage distribution, as determined by endorectal ultrasound (u), included uT2N0 in 2%, uT3N0 in 47%, uT3N1 in 49%, and uT4N0 in 2% of cases; endorectal ultrasound was not performed in 13% of cases (15 patients). Approximately 6 weeks after completion of CTX/XRT, surgery was performed. Results: The pathological tumor stages were Tis-2N0 in 26%, T2N1 in 5%, T3N0 in 21%, T3N1 in 15%, T4N0 in 5%, and T4N1 in 1%; a complete response (CR) to preoperative CTX/XRT was pathologically confirmed in 32 (27%) of patients. Tumor downstaging occurred in 72 (62%) cases. Only 3% of cases had pathologic evidence of progressive disease. Pretreatment tumor size (< 5 cm vs. greater than or equal to 5 cm) was the only factor predictive of tumor downstaging (p < 0.04). A decrease of >1 T-stage level was accomplished in 45% of those downstaged. Overall, a sphincter-saving (SP) procedure was possible in 59% of patients and an abdominoperineal resection (APR) was required in 41% of cases. Factors predictive of SP included downstaging (p < 0.03), age > 40 years (p, < 0.007), pretreatment tumor distance, 3 to 6 cm from the anal verge (p < 0.00001), tumor size <6 cm (p < 0.02), mobility (p < 0.004), tumor stage <T4 (p < 0.01), and uN negative (p < < 0.008). SP was performed in 23 patients (72%) with a CR and in 48 (67%) of downstaged cases. Among the 69 tumors located < 6 cm from the anal verge, 29 (42%) were resected with a SP. The level of response was important for tumors located < 6 cm from the anal verge because a SP was performed in 9 of the 17 (53%) CRs in this group while only 20 of 52 patients (38%) had a SP when residual disease was present after CTX/XRT. For tumors located > 6 cm from the anal verge, SP was performed in 14 of the 15 (93%) patients with a CR and 32 of 33 (97%) of patients with residual disease (p < 0.00004). Conclusions: Significant tumor downstaging results from preoperative chemoradiation allowing sphincter sparing surgery in over 40% of patients whose tumors were located < 6 cm from the anal verge and who otherwise would have required colostomy. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1038
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   THE LACK OF IMPACT OF PELVIC IRRADIATION ON SMALL-BOWEL MOBILITY - IMPLICATIONS FOR RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING [J].
ACKER, JC ;
MARKS, LB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (05) :1473-1475
[2]  
Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[3]   RADICAL AND LOCAL EXCISIONAL METHODS OF SPHINCTER-SPARING SURGERY AFTER HIGH-DOSE RADIATION FOR CANCER OF THE DISTAL 3 CM OF THE RECTUM [J].
BANNON, JP ;
MARKS, GJ ;
MOHIUDDIN, M ;
RAKINIC, J ;
NONGZHOU, J ;
NAGLE, D .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 2 (03) :221-227
[4]   Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer: Predictive factors of tumor downstaging and residual tumor cell density (RTCD): Prognostic implications [J].
Berger, C ;
deMuret, A ;
Garaud, P ;
Chapet, S ;
Bourlier, P ;
ReynaudBougnoux, A ;
Dorval, E ;
deCalan, L ;
Huten, N ;
leFloch, O ;
Calais, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (03) :619-627
[5]   ORGAN AND FUNCTIONAL PRESERVATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ANORECTAL CANCERS [J].
BERMAN, SM .
CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1995, 13 (01) :96-107
[6]  
Cedermark B, 1996, ANN SURG ONCOL, V3, P423
[7]  
CEDERMARK B, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V75, P2269, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950501)75:9<2269::AID-CNCR2820750913>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-I
[9]   THE RATIONALE TO SWITCH FROM POSTOPERATIVE HYPERFRACTIONATED ACCELERATED RADIOTHERAPY TO PREOPERATIVE HYPERFRACTIONATED ACCELERATED RADIOTHERAPY IN RECTAL-CANCER [J].
COUCKE, PA ;
SARTORELLI, B ;
CUTTAT, JF ;
JEANNERET, W ;
GILLET, M ;
MIRIMANOFF, RO .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (01) :181-188
[10]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187