Soil water status and water table depth modelling using electromagnetic surveys for precision irrigation scheduling

被引:68
作者
Hedley, C. B. [1 ]
Roudier, P. [1 ]
Yule, I. J. [2 ]
Ekanayake, J. [1 ]
Bradbury, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Landcare Res, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
[2] Massey Univ, New Zealand Ctr Precis Agr, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[3] Lindsay Int ANZ Pty Ltd, Precis Irrigat, Feilding 4775, New Zealand
关键词
EM31; EM38; SAGA wetness index; Water table; Precision irrigation; TERRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.07.018
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Electromagnetic surveys have been used to quantify soil variability with respect to soil water storage in an irrigated maize field. A fluctuating water table sub-irrigates the crop in some places, and a wireless sensor network simultaneously monitors real-time depth of water table and soil moisture content, with large differences in soil moisture measured at any one time in these uniformly textured sands. These large differences justify assessment of the spatio-temporal variability of soil hydraulic properties when aiming for precision management of the resource. Regression models were used to spatially predict water table depth and moisture content at 50 cm using EM38 survey data, a rainfall time series and a wetness index extracted from a digital elevation model. A multiple linear regression modelling (MLM) approach was compared with a data-mining approach using a random forest model (RF). The RE model implements a more thorough interrogation of the data using classification trees with subsequent regression of the data and provided the best prediction of soil moisture (R-2=0.94; RMSE = 0.03 m(3) m(-3) using RE; R-2=0.77; RMSE = 0.06 m(3) m(-3) using MLM) and water table depth (R-2=0.91; RMSE = 7.17 cm using RF; R-2=0.71; RMSE = 12.48 cm using MLM). (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture [J].
Adamchuk, VI ;
Hummel, JW ;
Morgan, MT ;
Upadhyaya, SK .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2004, 44 (01) :71-91
[2]  
Aqualinc Research Limited, 2010, H100023 AQ RES LTD
[3]  
BEVEN K.J., 1979, Hydrol. Sci. Bulletin, V24, P43
[4]  
Bishop T.F.A., 2006, Environmental Soil-Landscape Modeling - Geographic Information Technologies and Pedometrics, P185, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00074-X
[5]  
Boehner J., 2002, SOIL CLASSIFICATION, P213
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]  
[Burt R. Soil Survey Staff Soil Survey Staff], 2004, SOIL SURVEY INVESTIG
[8]  
Campbell I.B., 1978, 38 NZ SOIL SURV
[9]  
Chernick M. R., 2008, Bootstrap methods, a guide for practitioners and researchers
[10]  
Claydon J.J., 1989, DSIR DIV LAND SOIL S