USEtox-the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment

被引:1042
作者
Rosenbaum, Ralph K. [1 ]
Bachmann, Till M. [2 ]
Gold, Lois Swirsky [3 ,4 ]
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. [5 ]
Jolliet, Olivier [6 ]
Juraske, Ronnie [7 ,8 ]
Koehler, Annette [8 ]
Larsen, Henrik F. [9 ]
MacLeod, Matthew [10 ]
Margni, Manuele [1 ]
McKone, Thomas E. [11 ]
Payet, Jerome [12 ]
Schuhmacher, Marta [7 ]
van de Meent, Dik [5 ,13 ]
Hauschild, Michael Z. [9 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech, CIRAIG, Dept Chem Engn, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada
[2] Univ Karlsruhe, EIFER, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Oakland, CA USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Oakland, Res Inst, Oakland, CA 94609 USA
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Environm Sci, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Michigan, Ctr Risk Sci & Commun, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Sch Chem Engn, Tarragona 43007, Spain
[8] ETH, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Management Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[10] ETH, Inst Chem & Bioengn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[11] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[12] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Inst Environm Sci & Technol, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[13] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
Characterisation factors; Characterisation modelling; Comparative impact assessment; Comparison; Consensus model; Freshwater ecotoxicity; Harmonisation; Human exposure; Human toxicity; LCIA; Life cycle impact assessment; Toxic impact;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background, aim and scope In 2005, a comprehensive comparison of life cycle impact assessment toxicity characterisation models was initiated by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP)-Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative, directly involving the model developers of CalTOX, IMPACT 2002, USES-LCA, BETR, EDIP, WATSON and EcoSense. In this paper, we describe this model comparison process and its results-in particular the scientific consensus model developed by the model developers. The main objectives of this effort were (1) to identify specific sources of differences between the models' results and structure, (2) to detect the indispensable model components and (3) to build a scientific consensus model from them, representing recommended practice. Materials and methods A chemical test set of 45 organics covering a wide range of property combinations was selected for this purpose. All models used this set. In three workshops, the model comparison participants identified key fate, exposure and effect issues via comparison of the final characterisation factors and selected intermediate outputs for fate, human exposure and toxic effects for the test set applied to all models. Results Through this process, we were able to reduce inter-model variation from an initial range of up to 13 orders of magnitude down to no more than two orders of magnitude for any substance. This led to the development of USEtox, a scientific consensus model that contains only the most influential model elements. These were, for example, process formulations accounting for intermittent rain, defining a closed or open system environment or nesting an urban box in a continental box. Discussion The precision of the new characterisation factors (CFs) is within a factor of 100-1,000 for human health and 10-100 for freshwater ecotoxicity of all other models compared to 12 orders of magnitude variation between the CFs of each model, respectively. The achieved reduction of inter-model variability by up to 11 orders of magnitude is a significant improvement. Conclusions USEtox provides a parsimonious and transparent tool for human health and ecosystem CF estimates. Based on a referenced database, it has now been used to calculate CFs for several thousand substances and forms the basis of the recommendations from UNEP-SETAC's Life Cycle Initiative regarding characterisation of toxic impacts in life cycle assessment. recommendations and perspectives We provide both recommended and interim (not recommended and to be used with caution) characterisation factors for human health and freshwater ecotoxicity impacts. After a process of consensus building among stakeholders on a broad scale as well as several improvements regarding a wider and easier applicability of the model, USEtox will become available to practitioners for the calculation of further CFs.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 546
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], DECLARATION APELDOOR
  • [2] [Anonymous], LBNL47254
  • [3] Estimating biodegradation half-lives for use in chemical screening
    Aronson, Dallas
    Boethling, Robert
    Howard, Philip
    Stiteler, William
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2006, 63 (11) : 1953 - 1960
  • [4] Bachmann TM, 2006, TRACE METALS OTHER, V8, P1
  • [5] Predicting long range transport:: A systematic evaluation of two multimedia transport models
    Bennett, DH
    Scheringer, M
    McKone, TE
    Hungerbühler, K
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (06) : 1181 - 1189
  • [6] COWAN CE, 1994, MULTIMEDIA FATE MODE
  • [7] Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99 - Does it matter which one you choose?
    Dreyer, LC
    Niemann, AL
    Hauschild, MZ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (04) : 191 - 200
  • [8] *EC, 2005, EXTERNE EXT EN METH
  • [9] *ECOTOX, 2001, ECOTOXICOLOGY DAT SY
  • [10] European Commission, 1999, EXT FUEL CYCL EXTERN, V7