A temporal dissociation of subliminal versus supraliminal fear perception: An event-related potential study

被引:174
作者
Liddell, BJ [1 ]
Williams, LM
Rathjen, J
Shevrin, H
Gordon, E
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Brain Dynam Ctr, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/089892904322926809
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Current theories of emotion suggest that threat-related stimuli are first processed via an automatically engaged neural mechanism, which occurs outside conscious awareness. This mechanism operates in conjunction with a slower and more comprehensive process that allows a detailed evaluation of the potentially harmful stimulus (LeDoux, 1998). We drew on the Halgren and Marinkovic (1995) model to examine these processes using event-related potentials (ERPs) within a backward masking paradigm. Stimuli used were faces with fear and neutral (as baseline control) expressions, presented above (supraliminal) and below (subliminal) the threshold for conscious detection. ERP data revealed a double dissociation for the supraliminal versus subliminal perception of fear. In the subliminal condition, responses to the perception of fear stimuli were enhanced relative to neutral for the N2 "excitatory" component, which is thought to represent orienting and automatic aspects of face processing. By contrast, supraliminal perception of fear was associated with relatively enhanced responses for the late P3 "inhibitory" component, implicated in the integration of emotional processes. These findings provide evidence in support of Halgren and Marinkovic's temporal model of emotion processing, and indicate that the neural mechanisms for appraising signals of threat may be initiated, not only automatically, but also without the need for conscious detection of these signals.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 486
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SCI AM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Mind and Brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience
[3]   Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans [J].
Bentin, S ;
Allison, T ;
Puce, A ;
Perez, E ;
McCarthy, G .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (06) :551-565
[4]   Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing [J].
Bernat, E ;
Bunce, S ;
Shevrin, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 42 (01) :11-34
[5]   AN ELECTRODE CAP TESTED [J].
BLOM, JL ;
ANNEVELDT, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 54 (05) :591-594
[6]   Response and habituation of the human amygdala during visual processing of facial expression [J].
Breiter, HC ;
Etcoff, NL ;
Whalen, PJ ;
Kennedy, WA ;
Rauch, SL ;
Buckner, RL ;
Strauss, MM ;
Hyman, SE ;
Rosen, BR .
NEURON, 1996, 17 (05) :875-887
[7]   Further evidence for unconscious learning: preliminary support for the conditioning of facial EMG to subliminal stimuli [J].
Bunce, SC ;
Bernat, E ;
Wong, PS ;
Shevrin, H .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (04) :341-347
[8]  
Critchley H, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V9, P93, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(200002)9:2<93::AID-HBM4>3.3.CO
[9]  
2-Q
[10]   The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex [J].
Damasio, AR .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 351 (1346) :1413-1420