Strategies for protein coexpression in Escherichia coli

被引:176
作者
Tolia, NH [1 ]
Joshua-Tor, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Cold Spring Harbor Lab, Keck Struct Biol Lab, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nmeth0106-55
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
E. coli is a convenient host for heterologous protein expression. Its advantages include high levels of heterologous gene expression and scalability of experiments, tow cost, fast growth, a tack of posttranslational modification and an ability to express labeled (isotope or seleno-methionine) proteins. However, heterologous gene expression in E. coli can lead to the production of insoluble and/or nonfunctional target proteins. This is often due to the absence of cofactors or post-translational modifications required for function, stability or folding. Coexpression of multiple genes in E. coli, such as the members of a stable multiprotein complex(1) or a protein with a chaperone(2,3), can in many cases alleviate these problems. Coexpression involves the transformation of E. coli with several plasmids that have compatible origins of replication and independent antibiotic selection for maintenance. The Duet (Novagen) vectors have two multiple cloning sites per vector, five compatible origins of replication and four antibiotic selection markers, allowing the simultaneous expression of up to eight proteins. The combination of Duet vectors with other commercial plasmids allows the use of affinity tags, such as glutathione S-transferase (GST) or maltose binding protein (MBP), which can ease the recovery and improve the solubility of the desired target. Coexpression in E. cot! therefore provides a useful alternative to the complicated and expensive expression systems, such as yeast, baculovirus or mammalian cell culture, which are commonly used to overcome problems of heterologous protein expression. A summary of the method is presented in Figure 1.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 64
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] CO-OVEREXPRESSION OF BACTERIAL GROESL CHAPERONINS PARTLY OVERCOMES NONPRODUCTIVE FOLDING AND TETRAMER ASSEMBLY OF E-COLI-EXPRESSED HUMAN MEDIUM-CHAIN ACYL-COA DEHYDROGENASE (MCAD) CARRYING THE PREVALENT DISEASE-CAUSING K304E MUTATION
    BROSS, P
    ANDRESEN, BS
    WINTER, V
    KRAUTLE, F
    JENSEN, TG
    NANDY, A
    KOLVRAA, S
    GHISLA, S
    BOLUND, L
    GREGERSEN, N
    [J]. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1993, 1182 (03) : 264 - 274
  • [2] MECHANISM OF CONTROL OF DNA-REPLICATION AND INCOMPATIBILITY IN COLE1-TYPE PLASMIDS - A REVIEW
    DAVISON, J
    [J]. GENE, 1984, 28 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [3] Held D, 2003, INNOVATIONS, V18, P4
  • [4] Compatible bacterial plasmids are targeted to independent cellular locations in Escherichia coli
    Ho, TQ
    Zhong, ZP
    Aung, S
    Pogliano, J
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 2002, 21 (07) : 1864 - 1872
  • [5] Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein is uncommonly effective at promoting the solubility of polypeptides to which it is fused
    Kapust, RB
    Waugh, DS
    [J]. PROTEIN SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (08) : 1668 - 1674
  • [6] Coexpression of nuclear receptor partners increases their solubility and biological activities
    Li, C
    Schwabe, JWR
    Banayo, E
    Evans, RM
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (06) : 2278 - 2283
  • [7] Argonaute2 is the catalytic engine of mammalian RNAi
    Liu, JD
    Carmell, MA
    Rivas, FV
    Marsden, CG
    Thomson, JM
    Song, JJ
    Hammond, SM
    Joshua-Tor, L
    Hannon, GJ
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2004, 305 (5689) : 1437 - 1441
  • [8] Meister G, 2004, MOL CELL, V15, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.007
  • [9] Purified Argonaute2 and an siRNA form recombinant human RISC
    Rivas, FV
    Tolia, NH
    Song, JJ
    Aragon, JP
    Liu, JD
    Hannon, GJ
    Joshua-Tor, L
    [J]. NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (04) : 340 - 349
  • [10] THE ORIGIN OF REPLICATION OF PLASMID-P15A AND COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON THE NUCLEOTIDE-SEQUENCES AROUND THE ORIGIN OF RELATED PLASMIDS
    SELZER, G
    SOM, T
    ITOH, T
    TOMIZAWA, J
    [J]. CELL, 1983, 32 (01) : 119 - 129