Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening

被引:78
作者
Myers, RE
Turner, B
Weinberg, D
Hyslop, T
Hauck, WW
Brigham, T
Rothermel, T
Grana, J
Schlackman, N
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Med, Div Genet & Prevent Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Med, Div Clin Pharmacol, Biostat Sect, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Jefferson Med Coll, Deans Off, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] US Qual Algorithms Inc, Blue Bell, PA 19422 USA
关键词
colorectal neoplasm; occult blood; mass screening; follow-up studies;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Complete diagnostic evaluation or CDE (i.e., colonoscopy or combined flexible sigmoidoscopy plus barium enema X-ray) is often not performed for persons with an abnormal screening fecal occult blood test (FOBT+) result. Method. This study evaluated the impact of a reminder-feedback and educational outreach intervention on primary care practice CDE recommendation and performance rates. Four hundred seventy primary care physicians (PCPs) in 318 practices participated in the study. Patients were mailed an FOBT kit annually as part of a screening program. Practices were randomly assigned to a Control Group (N= 198) or an Intervention Group (N = 120). During an 18-month pre-randomization period and a 9-month post-randomization period, 2,992 screening FOBT+ patients were identified. Intervention practices received the screening program and the intervention. Control practices received only the screening program. Study outcomes were baseline-adjusted CDE recommendation and performance rates. Results. At baseline, about two-thirds of FOBT+ patients received a CDE recommendation, and about half had a CDE performed. At endpoint, CDE recommendation and performance rates were both significantly higher for the Intervention as compared to the Control practices (OR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.37, 3.78, and OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.50, respectively). Conclusions. The reminder-feedback plus educational outreach intervention significantly increased CDE recommendation and performance. (C) 2003 The Institute For Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2000, CANC FACT FIG 2003
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL FDN THOUGH AC
[3]  
AUSTIN SM, 1994, P S COMP APPL MED CA, P12
[4]  
BELCHER D W, 1988, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, V4, P27
[5]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[6]   CHANGING PHYSICIAN BEHAVIOR TO IMPROVE DISEASE PREVENTION [J].
COHEN, SJ ;
HALVORSON, HW ;
GOSSELINK, CA .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1994, 23 (03) :284-291
[7]  
Curtis P, 1993, Fam Med, V25, P135
[8]   EVIDENCE FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CME - A REVIEW OF 50 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS [J].
DAVIS, DA ;
THOMSON, MA ;
OXMAN, AD ;
HAYNES, RB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (09) :1111-1117
[9]   CANCER - IMPROVING EARLY DETECTION AND PREVENTION - A COMMUNITY PRACTICE RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
DIETRICH, AJ ;
OCONNOR, GT ;
KELLER, A ;
CARNEY, PA ;
LEVY, D ;
WHALEY, FS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6828) :687-691
[10]  
DIETRICH AJ, 1994, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V3, P335