GHG accounting for public transport in Xiamen city, China

被引:10
作者
Cui, Shenghui [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Fanxin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jianyi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Urban Environm, Key Lab Urban Environm & Hlth, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Key Lab Urban Metab, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CARBON FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; RAPID-TRANSIT SYSTEM; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; OPTIONS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.4155/CMT.11.32
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
How to account for GHG emissions for public transport is now a key issue for low-carbon city development. This study provides a method to evaluate carbon footprinting for public transport systems in Xiamen city, China across the life cycle. This method, which was based on the life cycle assessment approach including three components - infrastructure, fuels and vehicles - was presented to account the GHG emissions of public transport. The GHG emissions of the two kinds of public transport systems (bus rapid transit [BRT] and normal bus transit [NRT]) in Xiamen City were compared. Results showed that the average carbon emissions of the BRT system was 638.44 gCO(2)e per person, and that of the NBT system was 2,088.38 gCO(2)e. If we only took the direct carbon emissions of fuel consumption in the vehicle operation into consideration, the average carbon emissions were, respectively, approximately 149.08 gCO(2)e per person and 260.84 gCO(2)e per person by BRT and NBT system. The results indicated that the effects of energy saving from the BRT system are better than NBT system, which is related to the features of the BRT system such as large volume, energy-saving and environment-friendly vehicle type and exclusive right-of way.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 395
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   A modeling framework for Bus Rapid Transit operations evaluation and service planning [J].
Abdelghany, Khaled F. ;
Mahmassani, Hani S. ;
Abdelghany, Ahmed F. .
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 30 (06) :571-591
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, IPCC GUID NAT GREENH
[3]   Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland [J].
Asif, M. ;
Muneer, T. ;
Kelley, R. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 42 (03) :1391-1394
[4]   Carbon neutral Biggar: calculating the community carbon footprint and renewable energy options for footprint reduction [J].
Barthelmie, R. J. ;
Morris, S. D. ;
Schechter, P. .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2008, 3 (02) :267-282
[5]   Emission inventory for the road transport sector in Sardinia (Italy) [J].
Bellasio, R. ;
Bianconi, R. ;
Corda, G. ;
Cucca, P. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (04) :677-691
[6]   Bus rapid transit identity meets universal design [J].
Bitterman, Alex ;
Hess, Daniel Baldwin .
DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2008, 23 (05) :445-459
[7]  
Burnham A., 2006, Development and Applications of GREET 2 . 7 - The Transportation Vehicle-Cycle Model
[8]  
*CARB TRUST, 2008, GUID PAS 2050 ASS CA
[9]  
Carpenter AC, 2006, 6 INT C DEV REUS MIN, P1458
[10]  
Christen K, 2007, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V41, P6636