Levels of urinary total and speciated arsenic in the US population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004

被引:152
作者
Caldwell, Kathleen L. [1 ]
Jones, Robert L. [1 ]
Verdon, Carl P. [1 ]
Jarrett, Jeffery M. [1 ]
Caudill, Samuel P. [1 ]
Osterloh, John D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Environm Hlth, Div Sci Lab, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
关键词
speciated arsenic; human; urine; biomonitoring; NHANES; DRINKING-WATER; METHYLATED METABOLITES; EXPOSURE; EXCRETION; ADULTS; BANGLADESH; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1038/jes.2008.32
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Objective: To provide levels of total and speciated urinary arsenic in a representative sample of the US population. Methods: For the first time, total arsenic and seven inorganic and organic arsenic species were measured in the urine of participants (n = 2557) for the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Data were compiled as geometric means and selected percentiles of urinary arsenic concentrations (mu g/l) and creatinine-corrected urinary arsenic (mu g/g creatinine) for total arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, arsenobetaine, and a sum of the inorganic related species. Results: Arsenic acid, arsenous acid, arsenocholine, and trimethylarsine oxide were detected in 7.6%, 4.6%, 1.8%, and 0.3% of the participants, respectively (the limits of detection of 0.6-1.2 mu g/l). Monomethylarsonic acid was detected in 35% of the overall population. For all participants aged >= 6 years, dimethylarsinic acid (geometric mean of 3.71 mu g/l) and arsenobetaine (geometric mean of 1.55 mu g/l) had the greatest contribution to the total urinary arsenic levels. A relatively greater percentage contribution from arsenobetaine is seen at higher total urinary arsenic levels and from dimethylarsinic acid at lower total urinary arsenic levels. For all participants aged >= 6 years, the 95th percentiles for total urinary arsenic and the sum of inorganic-related arsenic (arsenic acid, arsenous acid, dimethylarsinic acid, and monomethylarsonic acid) were 65.4 and 18.9 mu g/l, respectively. For total arsenic and dimethylarsinic acid, covariate-adjusted geometric means demonstrated several slight differences due to age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Conclusions: The data reflect relative background contributions of inorganic and seafood-related arsenic exposures in the US population. Arsenobetaine and dimethylarsinic acid are the major arsenic species present with arsenobetaine, accounting for a greater proportion of total arsenic as total arsenic levels increase.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 68
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ACGIH, 2001, DOC BIOL EXP IND
[2]  
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, TOX PROF ARS 2007
[3]   Associations between drinking water and urinary arsenic levels and skin lesions in Bangladesh [J].
Ahsan, H ;
Perrin, M ;
Rahman, A ;
Parvez, F ;
Stute, M ;
Zheng, Y ;
Milton, AH ;
Brandt-Rauf, P ;
van Geen, A ;
Graziano, J .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2000, 42 (12) :1195-1201
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ARS DRINK WAT 2001 U
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NAT HLTH NUTR EX SUR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Environmental Health Criteria, V224
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, About the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
[8]   Occurrence of monomethylarsonous acid in urine of humans exposed to inorganic arsenic [J].
Aposhian, HV ;
Gurzau, ES ;
Le, XC ;
Gurzau, A ;
Healy, SM ;
Lu, XF ;
Ma, MS ;
Yip, L ;
Zakharyan, RA ;
Maiorino, RM ;
Dart, RC ;
Tircus, MG ;
Gonzalez-Ramirez, D ;
Morgan, DL ;
Avram, D ;
Aposhian, MM .
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 13 (08) :693-697
[9]   Urinary creatinine concentrations in the US population: Implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements [J].
Barr, DB ;
Wilder, LC ;
Caudill, SP ;
Gonzalez, AJ ;
Needham, LL ;
Pirkle, JL .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (02) :192-200
[10]   Exposure to inorganic arsenic in drinking water and total urinary arsenic concentration in a Chilean population [J].
Caceres, DD ;
Pino, P ;
Montesinos, N ;
Atalah, E ;
Amigo, H ;
Loomis, D .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 98 (02) :151-159