Evolution of supercolonies: The Argentine ants of southern Europe

被引:344
作者
Giraud, T
Pedersen, JS
Keller, L
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Inst Ecol, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Paris 11, F-91405 Orsay, France
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Zool, Dept Populat Ecol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.092694199
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Some ants have an extraordinary social organization, called unicoloniality, whereby individuals mix freely among physically separated nests. This type of social organization is not only a key attribute responsible for the ecological domination of these ants, but also an evolutionary paradox and a potential problem for kin selection theory because relatedness between nest mates is effectively zero. The introduction of the Argentine ant in Europe was apparently accompanied by a dramatic loss of inter-nest aggression and the formation of two immense supercolonies (which effectively are two unicolonial populations). Introduced populations experienced only limited loss of genetic diversity at neutral markers, indicating that the breakdown of recognition ability is unlikely to be merely due to a genetic bottleneck. Rather, we suggest that a "genetic cleansing" of recognition cues occurred after introduction. indeed workers of the same supercolony are never aggressive to each other despite the large geographical distance and considerable genetic differentiation between sampling sites. By contrast, aggression is invariably extremely high between the two supercolonies, indicating that they have become fixed for different recognition alleles. The main supercolony, which ranges over 6,000 km from Italy to the Spanish Atlantic coast, effectively forms the largest cooperative unit ever recorded.
引用
收藏
页码:6075 / 6079
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Evolution of social insect colonies, DOI [10.2307/3495984, DOI 10.2307/3495984]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Kin Recognition
[3]  
Bolger DT, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P1230, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1230:AIUHFI]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
BOURKE A.F.G., 1995, Social evolution in ants
[6]   The influence of sociality on the conservation biology of social insects [J].
Chapman, RE ;
Bourke, AFG .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 4 (06) :650-662
[7]  
Chapuisat M, 1997, EVOLUTION, V51, P475, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02435.x
[8]  
Crozier R.H., 1979, P223
[9]  
CROZIER RH, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P1100, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00578.x
[10]  
Fletcher DJ., 1987, KIN RECOGNITION ANIM