Simulating the effects of mapping and spraying resolution and threshold level on accuracy of patch spraying decisions and herbicide use based on mapped weed data

被引:8
作者
Berge, Therese With [1 ,2 ]
Cederkvist, Henrik Rene [3 ]
Aastveit, Are H. [3 ]
Fykse, Haldor [2 ]
机构
[1] Bioforsk, Plant Hlth & Plant Protect Div, Norwegian Inst Agr & Environm Res, N-1432 As, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, As, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Chem Biotechnol & Food Sci, As, Norway
关键词
cereals; online weed detection; precision farming; real-time implementation;
D O I
10.1080/09064710701593087
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A possible cost-effective real-time patch spraying implementation against seed-propagated broad-leaved weeds in cereals is a camera mounted in front of the tractor taking images at feasible distances in the direction of travel, on-board image analysis software and entire boom switched on and off. To assess this implementation, manual weed counts (0.25 m(2) quadrats) in a 1.5 m x 2 m grid, were used to simulate camera outputs. Each quadrat was classified into 'spray' and 'not spray' decisions based on a threshold model, and the resulting map defined the 'ground truth'. Subsequently, 'on/off' spraying at larger control areas where sizes were given by the boom width and image distance, and spraying decision controlled by weed status at the single quadrat simulating the camera's view, were simulated. These coarser maps were compared with 'ground truth', to estimate mapping error (area above threshold not sprayed), spraying error (area below threshold sprayed), total error (sum of mapping and spraying error) and the herbicide reduction. Three levels of the threshold model were tested. Results were used to fit models that predict errors from boom width and image distance. Size of control area did not on average affect the magnitude of the simulated herbicide reductions, but the bigger the control area the higher the risk that the simulated herbicide reduction deviate from the reduction in 'ground truth'. Mean simulated herbicide reductions were 42-59%, depending on threshold level. Only minor differences due to threshold level were seen for mean mapping and spraying errors at given spraying resolutions. Using original threshold level and image distance 2 m, predicted total errors for boom widths 2 m, 6 m, 20 m and 40 m would be 6%, 10%, 16% and 17%, respectively. Results indicate that control area should not exceed about 10 m 2 if acceptable total error is maximum 10%.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 229
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Assessment of weed density at an early stage by use of image processing [J].
Andreasen, C ;
Rudemo, M ;
Sevestre, S .
WEED RESEARCH, 1997, 37 (01) :5-18
[2]  
Backes M, 2005, PRECISION AGRICULTURE 05, P155
[3]  
Backes M., 2003, P 9 SCAND RES C GEOG, P261
[4]   Simulating the effects of weed spatial pattern and resolution of mapping and spraying on economics of site-specific management [J].
Barroso, J ;
Fernandez-Quintanilla, C ;
Maxwell, BD ;
Rew, LJ .
WEED RESEARCH, 2004, 44 (06) :460-468
[5]   Patch spraying of weeds in spring cereals: Simulated influences of threshold level and spraying resolution on spraying errors and potential herbicide reduction [J].
Berge, Therese With ;
Fykse, Haldor ;
Aastveit, Are H. .
ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2007, 57 (03) :212-221
[6]   AN ECONOMIC THRESHOLD-MODEL FOR SPRAYING HERBICIDES IN CEREALS [J].
BLACK, ID ;
DYSON, CB .
WEED RESEARCH, 1993, 33 (04) :279-290
[7]   The nature and consequence of weed spatial distribution [J].
Cardina, J ;
Johnson, GA ;
Sparrow, DH .
WEED SCIENCE, 1997, 45 (03) :364-373
[8]  
Carroll JP, 2005, T ASAE, V48, P27, DOI 10.13031/2013.17937
[9]   CROP-WEED COMPETITION AND HERBICIDE PERFORMANCE IN CEREAL SPECIES AND VARIETIES [J].
CHRISTENSEN, S .
WEED RESEARCH, 1994, 34 (01) :29-36
[10]  
CHRISTENSEN S, 2006, TABLE 1 POTENTIAL SA