Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae)

被引:180
作者
Alexandersson, R
Johnson, SD
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Plant Ecol, Evolutionary Biol Ctr, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Bot & Zool, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
关键词
Agrius convolvuli; flower tube; flower morphology; Gladiolus longicollis; hawkmoth pollination; selection;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2001.1928
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Darwin's mechanistic model whereby selection favours plants with flower tubes that exceed the tongue length of the primary pollinator, was tested using unmanipulated plants of the hawkmoth-pollinated South African iris, Gladiolus longicollis. The study population was characterized by exceptionally large phenotypic variation in flower-tube length (range 56-129 mm). Directional selection on tube length was revealed by a significant positive relationship between this trait and both fruit and seed set. Selection was attributed to the effect of tube length on pollen receipt, as supplemental hand pollinations showed fruit and seed set in the population to be pollen limited. Indirect selection on tube length may also occur through the correlation of this trait with inflorescence height, although direct selection on the latter trait was significant only for seed set. The main pollinators at the study site were individuals of the large hawkmoth Agrius convolvuli that had tongue lengths of 85-135 mm. Other hawkmoths had tongues that were much too short to reach the nectar in G. longicollis flowers and seldom carried pollen of G. longicollis. Flowers with tubes shorter than the tongues of A. convolvuli are apparently not effectively pollinated because stigmas do not contact the moth's head effectively. This study demonstrates that selection may occur among plants with natural phenotypic variation in flower-tube length, and supports Darwin's model of pollinator-mediated selection.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 636
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
BEATTIE AJ, 1971, PAN-PAC ENTOMOL, V47, P82
[2]   Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata [J].
Campbell, DR ;
Waser, NM ;
Price, MV .
ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (05) :1463-1472
[3]   Stabilizing selection and the structural variability of flowers within species [J].
Cresswell, JE .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1998, 81 (04) :463-473
[4]  
DARWIN C, 1862, VARIOUS CONTRIVANCES
[5]   STATISTICAL-DATA ANALYSIS IN THE COMPUTER-AGE [J].
EFRON, B ;
TIBSHIRANI, R .
SCIENCE, 1991, 253 (5018) :390-395
[6]  
FAEGRI K, 1979, P244
[7]   Why do flowers vary? The functional ecology of variation in flower size and form within natural plant populations [J].
Galen, C .
BIOSCIENCE, 1999, 49 (08) :631-640
[8]  
GOLDBLATT P, 1998, GLADIOLOS SO AFRICA
[9]  
Heinrich B., 1979, Bumblebee Economics
[10]   SELECTION ON FLORAL MORPHOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF FECUNDITY IN A HAWK-MOTH-POLLINATED VIOLET [J].
HERRERA, CM .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1993, 63 (03) :251-275