Gestational diabetes: implications of variation in post-partum follow-up criteria

被引:26
作者
Agarwal, MM
Punnose, J
Dhatt, GS
机构
[1] UAE Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[2] Al Ain Hosp, Dept Med, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[3] Tawam Hosp, Dept Pathol, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
关键词
postpartum OGTT; WHO; ADA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the recommendations of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) with the World Health Organization (WHO) for evaluating women with gestational diabetes (GDM) after delivery. Study design: During a 5-year period, 549 patients underwent the 2 h, 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 4-8 weeks after delivery. They were classified by the criteria of WHO (1985), the ADA [1997, fasting glucose (FPG)] and the revised WHO (1999). Results: The prevalence of diabetes by WHO-1985 and ADA-1997 were similar (8.2% versus 6.6%) but estimates of impaired glucose homeostasis varied widely (15.5% impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) versus 9.3% impaired fasting glucose. respectively). 118 (21.5%) women and 83 (15.1%) women showed a classification discrepancy between ADA-1997 with the WHO-1985 and -1999, respectively. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve area of the FPG was 0.94 for DM by the OGTT (WHO-1985 criteria) but only 0.59 for IGT by the 2 It post-glucose. Conclusions: The various guidelines for GDM follow-up after delivery, often based on expert opinion, produce similar estimates for diabetes prevalence but widely discordant results for glucose intolerance. Until more uniform evidence-based criteria become available, the various strategies for GDM follow-up will continue to cause confusion in clinical practice. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Gestational diabetes screening of a multiethnic, high-risk population using glycated proteins [J].
Agarwal, MM ;
Hughes, PF ;
Punnose, J ;
Ezimokhai, M ;
Thomas, L .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 51 (01) :67-73
[2]   Fasting plasma glucose as a screening test for gestational diabetes in a multi-ethnic, high-risk population [J].
Agarwal, MM ;
Hughes, PF ;
Punnose, J ;
Ezimokhai, M .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (10) :720-726
[3]   Gestational diabetes: implications of variation in diagnostic criteria [J].
Agarwal, MM ;
Punnose, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2002, 78 (01) :45-46
[4]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics, 2001, Obstet Gynecol, V98, P525
[5]   Comparison of ADA and WHO criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes in elderly Koreans [J].
Choi, KM ;
Lee, J ;
Kim, DR ;
Kim, SK ;
Shin, DH ;
Kim, NH ;
Park, IB ;
Choi, DS ;
Baik, SH .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2002, 19 (10) :853-857
[6]   Effects of new criteria for type 2 diabetes on the rate of postpartum glucose intolerance in women with gestational diabetes [J].
Conway, DL ;
Langer, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (03) :610-614
[7]   Post-partum reclassification of glucose tolerance in women previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus [J].
Costa, A ;
Carmona, F ;
Martinez-Roman, S ;
Quintó, L ;
Levy, I ;
Conget, I .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (08) :595-598
[8]   The 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria versus the 1985 World Health Organization criteria for the diagnosis of abnormal glucose tolerance - Poor agreement in the Hoorn study [J].
De Vegt, F ;
Dekker, JM ;
Stehouwer, CDA ;
Nijpels, G ;
Bouter, LM ;
Heine, R .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (10) :1686-1690
[9]  
*EXP COMM DIAGN CL, 2003, DIABET CARE S, V26, pS103
[10]   Comparison of glucose tolerance categories according to World Health Organization and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria in a population-based study in Brazil [J].
Gimeno, SGA ;
Ferreira, SRG ;
Franco, LJ ;
Iunes, M .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (11) :1889-1892