Phase III trial of intraperitoneal therapy with yttrium-90-labeled HMFG1 murine monoclonal antibody in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer after a surgically defined complete remission

被引:144
作者
Verheijen, RH
Massuger, LF
Benigno, BB
Epenetos, AA
Lopes, A
Soper, JT
Markowska, J
Vyzula, R
Jobling, T
Stamp, G
Spiegel, G
Thurston, D
Falke, T
Lambert, J
Seiden, MV
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Netherlands
[4] SE Gynecol Oncol, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Durham, NC USA
[6] Scripps Clin, La Jolla, CA USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[8] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci & Technol, Bartholomews Hosp, London, England
[9] Hammersmith Hosp, London, England
[10] Guys & St Thomas Natl Hlth Serv, Fdn Trust, London, England
[11] Poznan Univ Tech, Sch Med Sci, Poznan, Poland
[12] Mararyk Mem Canc Inst, Brno, Czech Republic
[13] Monash Med Ctr, E Bentleigh, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.02.5973
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This was a multinational, open-label, randomized phase III trial comparing yttrium-90-labeled murine HMFG1 (Y-90-muHMFG1) plus standard treatment versus standard treatment alone in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who had attained a complete clinical remission after cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients and Methods In total, 844 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ic to IV patients were initially screened, of whom 447 patients with a negative second-look laparoscopy (SILL) were randomly assigned to receive either a single dose of Y-90-muHMFG1 plus standard treatment (224 patients) or standard treatment alone (223 patients). Patients in the active treatment arm received a single intraperitoneal dose of 25 mg of Y-90-muHMFG1 (target dose 666 MBq/m(2)). The primary end point was length of survival; secondary end points included time to relapse and safety. The study had an 80% power to detect a 15% change in survival. Results After a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range, 1 to 6 years), 70 patients had died in the active treatment arm compared with 61 patients in the control arm. Cox proportional hazards analysis of survival demonstrated no difference between treatment arms. In the study drug arm, 104 patients experienced relapse compared with 98 patients in the standard treatment arm. No difference in time to relapse was observed between the two study arms. Active therapy was associated with occasional grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia and grade 1 or 2 GI symptoms, abdominal discomfort, arthralgia, and myalgia. Conclusion A single IP administration of Y-90-muHMFG1 to patients with EOC who had a negative SLL after primary therapy did not extend survival or time to relapse.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 578
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Long-term follow-up of a phase II trial of oral altretamine for consolidation of clinical complete remission in women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer in the Southwest Oncology Group [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Jiang, C ;
Liu, PY ;
Wilczynski, S ;
Markman, M ;
Rothenberg, ML .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2004, 14 (02) :224-228
[2]   A phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide as consolidation therapy in patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer following negative surgical assessment [J].
Barakat, RR ;
Almadrones, L ;
Venkatraman, ES ;
Aghajanian, C ;
Brown, C ;
Shapiro, F ;
Curtin, JP ;
Spriggs, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 69 (01) :17-22
[3]   Ten-year experience with laparoscopy on a gynecologic oncology service: Analysis of risk factors for complications and conversion to laparotomy [J].
Chi, DS ;
Abu-Rustum, NR ;
Sonoda, Y ;
Awtrey, C ;
Hummer, A ;
Venkatraman, ES ;
Franklin, CC ;
Hamilton, F ;
Gemignani, ML ;
Barakat, RR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (04) :1138-1145
[4]   Second look for ovarian cancer: Laparoscopy or laparotomy? A prospective comparative study [J].
Clough, KB ;
Ladonne, JM ;
Nos, C ;
Renolleau, C ;
Validire, P ;
Durand, JC .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 72 (03) :411-417
[5]   Topotecan compared with no therapy after response to surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with ovarian cancer: Multicenter Italian trials in ovarian cancer (MITO-1) randomized study [J].
De Placido, S ;
Scambia, G ;
Di Vagno, G ;
Naglieri, E ;
Lombardi, AV ;
Biamonte, R ;
Marinaccio, M ;
Carteni, G ;
Manzione, L ;
Febbraro, A ;
de Matteis, A ;
Gasparini, G ;
Valerio, MR ;
Danese, S ;
Perrone, F ;
Lauria, R ;
De Laurentiis, M ;
Greggi, S ;
Gallo, C ;
Pignata, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (13) :2635-2642
[6]   Synergy of Taxol and radioimmunotherapy with yttrium-90-labeled chimeric L6 antibody: Efficacy and toxicity in breast cancer xenografts [J].
DeNardo, SJ ;
Kukis, DL ;
Kroger, LA ;
ODonnell, RT ;
Lamborn, KR ;
Miers, LA ;
DeNardo, DG ;
Meares, CF ;
DeNardo, GL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (08) :4000-4004
[7]   Long term survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy [J].
Epenetos, AA ;
Hird, V ;
Lambert, H ;
Mason, P ;
Coulter, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2000, 10 :44-46
[8]  
EPENETOS AA, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P3183
[9]  
EPENETOS AA, 1982, LANCET, V2, P999
[10]   MUC1, the renaissance molecule [J].
Gendler, SJ .
JOURNAL OF MAMMARY GLAND BIOLOGY AND NEOPLASIA, 2001, 6 (03) :339-353