A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants' perceptions

被引:46
作者
Chang, Hsin-Yi [1 ]
Wang, Chia-Yu [2 ]
Lee, Min-Hsien [3 ]
Wu, Hsin-Kai [4 ]
Liang, Jyh-Chong [1 ]
Lee, Silvia W. -Y. [5 ]
Chiou, Guo-Li [1 ]
Lo, Hao-Chang [6 ]
Lin, Jing-Wen [7 ]
Hsu, Chung-Yuan [8 ]
Wu, Ying-Tien [9 ]
Chen, Sufen [1 ]
Hwang, Fu-Kwun [10 ]
Tsai, Chin-Chung [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Digital Learning & Educ, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Grad Inst Educ, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
[3] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Teacher Educ, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Grad Inst Sci Educ, Taipei 11677, Taiwan
[5] Natl Changhua Univ Educ, Grad Inst Sci Educ, Changhua 500, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taichung Univ Educ, Dept Digital Content & Technol, Taichung 40306, Taiwan
[7] Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Dept Curriculum Design & Human Potentials Dev, Hualien 97401, Taiwan
[8] Natl Pingtung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Child Care, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan
[9] Natl Cent Univ, Grad Inst Network Learning Technol, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan
[10] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Phys, Taipei 11677, Taiwan
关键词
Participant perception; Technology-supported learning environment; Instructional design; Review; HIGH-SCHOOL-STUDENTS; SELF-EFFICACY; DESIGN; PREFERENCES; FRAMEWORK; INSTRUMENT; TEACHERS; INQUIRY; SOFTWARE; DISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.042
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this study we reviewed 22 studies on developing instruments that measure teachers', students' and adult students' perceptions of learning environments enhanced by a certain type of technology. We conducted a review of all the instruments to propose a new framework conceptualizing technology-supported learning environments (TSLEs) for future instructional designs, and research on learning environments. This framework was also confirmed with the literature on learning theories. The framework consists of six dimensions: technical, content, cognitive, metacognitive, social, and affective. We found that the studies took more into consideration the technical, cognitive and social dimensions, and less the content, metacognitive, and affective dimensions. Moreover, usability in the technical dimension, relevance in the content dimension, inquiry learning in the cognitive dimension, student autonomy in the metacognitive dimension, and teacher support in the social dimension are the salient features most often investigated in TSLEs. The results provide insights into an overview of the instruments used for TSLEs, implications for the instructional design of TSLEs, and trends in the current and future research on perceptions of TSLEs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 237
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Development of a scale on learners' views on blended learning and its implementation process [J].
Akkoyunlu, Buket ;
Yilmaz-Soylu, Meryem .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 11 (01) :26-32
[2]  
Aldridge J.M., 2004, AUST J EDUC DEV PSYC, V4, P110
[3]  
Aldridge J. M., 2003, TECHNOLOGY RICH LEAR, P41
[4]  
[Anonymous], TESTS SCI RELATED AT
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT HDB SCI ED
[6]  
[Anonymous], THESIS NOVA SE U
[7]  
[Anonymous], FLEXIBLE FUTURES U T
[8]  
[Anonymous], THESIS ARAB OPEN U K
[9]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING ENV RES
[10]  
[Anonymous], ED RES