Pragmatic discourse and administrative legitimacy

被引:15
作者
Box, RC
机构
[1] University of Nebraska, Omaha
[2] Department of Public Administration, University of Nebraska, Omaha
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0275074002032001002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Legitimacy the place of public administration in governance, has always been a concern in American society. Responses to this concern hate included efforts to control bureaucracy by defining what it should do, to free it from control by elevating its status tit relation to other branches of government, and to confine it to micro-level, market-like management techniques, The discourse theory of O. C. McSwite, based on praginatism, suggests that, governmental legitimacy in America may be revived by shifting from an on the public administrator's role in directing agencies to thinking about how administrators may assist in creating community through collaboration with citizens. This article offers a critique and extension of McSwite's work based in part on critical theory arguing that to recover administrative legitimacy through collaborative discourse, it may be necesary to recognize and respond to the nature of the liberal-capitalist political environment.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 39
页数:20
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Agger B., 1992, The discourse of domination: From the Frankfurt School to postmodernism
[2]  
[Anonymous], ADM THEORY PRAXIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, The Foundations of American Citizenship: Liberalism, the Constitution, and Civic Virtue
[4]  
[Anonymous], ADM THEORY PRAXIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, UNDERSTANDING J DEWE
[6]  
[Anonymous], ADM THEORY PRAXIS
[7]  
Bennett WL, 1998, PS, V31, P741
[8]  
Bowles S., 1986, DEMOCRACY CAPITALISM
[9]  
Box R.C., 1998, CITIZEN GOVERNANCE L
[10]   CRITICAL-THEORY AND THE PARADOX OF DISCOURSE [J].
BOX, RC .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1995, 25 (01) :1-19