Analytical methods and database design: Implications for transplant researchers, 2005

被引:89
作者
Levine, GN [1 ]
McCullough, KP
Rodgers, AM
Dickinson, DM
Ashby, VB
Schaubel, DE
机构
[1] Univ Renal Res & Educ Assoc, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
SRTR; OPTN; statistical analysis; survival analysis; data collection; data sources; data structure; death ascertainment; transplant research;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01277.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding how transplant data are collected is crucial to understanding how the data can be used. The collection and use of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (OPTN/SRTR) data continues to evolve, leading to improvements in data quality, timeliness and scope while reducing the data collection burden. Additional ascertainment of outcomes completes and validates existing data, although caveats remain for researchers. We also consider analytical issues related to cohort choice, timing of data submission, and transplant center variations in follow-up data. All of these points should be carefully considered when choosing cohorts and data sources for analysis. The second part of the article describes some of the statistical methods for outcome analysis employed by the SRTR. Issues of cohort and follow-up period selection lead into a discussion of outcome definitions, event ascertainment, censoring and covariate adjustment. We describe methods for computing unadjusted mortality rates and survival probabilities, and estimating covariate effects through regression modeling. The article concludes with a description of simulated allocation modeling, developed by the SRTR for comparing outcomes of proposed changes to national organ allocation policies.
引用
收藏
页码:1228 / 1242
页数:15
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   NONPARAMETRIC INFERENCE FOR A FAMILY OF COUNTING PROCESSES [J].
AALEN, O .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1978, 6 (04) :701-726
[2]  
[Anonymous], J R STAT SOC
[3]   SRTR center-specific reporting tools: posttransplant outcomes [J].
Dickinson, DM ;
Shearon, TH ;
O'Keefe, J ;
Wong, HH ;
Berg, CL ;
Rosendale, JD ;
Delmonico, FL ;
Webb, RL ;
Wolfe, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (05) :1198-1211
[4]   Transplant data: sources, collection and research considerations, 2004 [J].
Dickinson, DM ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Levine, GN ;
Li, SQ ;
Welch, JC ;
Webb, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (04) :850-861
[5]   Data sources and structure [J].
Dickinson, DM ;
Ellison, MD ;
Webb, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 :13-28
[6]   Transplant data: sources, collection, and caveats [J].
Dickinson, DM ;
Bryant, PC ;
Williams, MC ;
Levine, GN ;
Li, SQ ;
Welch, JC ;
Keck, BM ;
Webb, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 :13-26
[7]   Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Roberts, JP ;
McDiarmid, S ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Merion, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 :114-131
[8]  
Kalbfleisch J. D., 2002, Wiley series in probability and statistics
[9]   SEMIPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE ADDITIVE RISK MODEL [J].
LIN, DY ;
YING, ZL .
BIOMETRIKA, 1994, 81 (01) :61-71
[10]   Analysis of clustered recurrent event data with application to hospitalization rates among renal failure patients [J].
Schaubel, DE ;
Cai, JW .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2005, 6 (03) :404-419