Effectiveness and tolerability of second-line therapy with vildagliptin vs. other oral agents in type 2 diabetes: A real-life worldwide observational study (EDGE)

被引:51
作者
Mathieu, C. [1 ]
Barnett, A. H. [2 ]
Brath, H. [3 ]
Conget, I. [4 ]
de Castro, J. J. [5 ]
Goeke, R. [6 ]
Marquez Rodriguez, E. [7 ]
Nilsson, P. M. [8 ]
Pagkalos, E. [9 ]
Penfornis, A. [10 ]
Schaper, N. C. [11 ]
Wangnoo, S. K. [12 ]
Kothny, W. [13 ]
Bader, G. [14 ]
机构
[1] IG Endocrinol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Birmingham, Dept Med, Heart England NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Hlth Ctr South, Vienna, Austria
[4] Armed Forces Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Diabet, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Hosp Clin & Univ, Diabet Unit, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Schwerpkt Diabetol, Innere Med, Kirchhain, Germany
[7] Hosp Civil Viejo, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
[8] Skane Univ Hosp, Clin Res Unit, Malmo, Sweden
[9] Private Hosp Thermi, Thessaloniki, Greece
[10] Univ Franche Comte, Dept Endocrinol Metab & Diabetol Nutr, Jean Minjoz Hosp, F-25030 Besancon, France
[11] Univ Hosp Maastricht, Div Endocrinol, Dept Internal Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
[12] Indraprastha Apollo Hosp, ACODE, New Delhi, India
[13] Nova Pharmaceut Corp, E Hanover, NJ USA
[14] Novartis Pharma AG, Global Med Affairs Diabet, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS; BLOOD-GLUCOSE CONTROL; PROPENSITY SCORE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; METFORMIN; COMPLICATIONS; PIOGLITAZONE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1111/ijcp.12252
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimReal-life studies are needed to confirm the clinical relevance of findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of vildagliptin add-on vs. other oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) added to OAD monotherapy in a real-life setting, and to explore the advantages and limitations of large-scale pragmatic' trials. MethodsEDGE was a prospective, 1-year, worldwide, real-life observational study in which 2957 physicians reported on the effects of second-line OADs in 45,868 patients with T2DM not reaching glycaemic targets with monotherapy. Physicians could add any OAD, and patients entered either vildagliptin or (pooled) comparator cohort. The primary effectiveness and tolerability end-point (PEP) evaluated proportions of patients decreasing HbA(1c)>0.3%, without hypoglycaemia, weight gain, peripheral oedema or gastrointestinal side effects. The most clinically relevant secondary end-point (SEP 3) was attainment of end-point HbA(1c)<7% without hypoglycaemia or 3% increase in body weight. ResultsIn this large group of T2DM patients, a second OAD was added at mean HbA(1c) of 8.21.3%, with no baseline HbA(1c) difference between cohorts. Second-line OAD therapy attained the PEP in the majority of patients, with higher attainment in those prescribed a vildagliptin-based regimen. The adjusted odds ratio was 1.49 (95% CI: 1.42, 1.55; p<0.001). In patients with baseline HbA(1c)7%, SEP 3 was achieved by 35% of patients on a vildagliptin-based combination and by 23% of those receiving comparator combinations. The adjusted odds ratio was 1.96 (95% CI: 1.85, 2.07; p<0.001). Safety events were reported infrequently and safety profiles of vildagliptin and other OADs were consistent with previous data. ConclusionEDGE demonstrates that in a real-life' setting, vildagliptin as second OAD can lower HbA(1c) to target without well-recognised OAD side effects, more frequently than comparator OADs. In addition, EDGE illustrates that conducting large-scale, prospective, real-life studies poses challenges but yields valuable clinical information complementary to RCTs.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 956
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, CLIN GUID ID EV TREA
[2]  
Bader G, 2013, DIABETES RES CLIN PR, DOI [10.1016/j.diabres.2013.03.011, DOI 10.1016/J.DIABRES.2013.03.011.[]
[3]   Efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin vs. pioglitazone when added to metformin: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind study [J].
Bolli, G. ;
Dotta, F. ;
Rochotte, E. ;
Cohen, S. E. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2008, 10 (01) :82-90
[4]   Comparison of vildagliptin and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin [J].
Bolli, G. ;
Dotta, F. ;
Colin, L. ;
Minic, B. ;
Goodman, M. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2009, 11 (06) :589-595
[5]  
Bruno Graziella, 2012, Diabetes Care, V35, pe64
[6]  
CPMP EMEA, GUID CLIN INV MED PR
[7]   Fifty-two-week efficacy and safety of vildagliptin vs. glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy [J].
Ferrannini, E. ;
Fonseca, V. ;
Zinman, B. ;
Matthews, D. ;
Ahren, B. ;
Byiers, S. ;
Shao, Q. ;
Dejager, S. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2009, 11 (02) :157-166
[8]   A comparison of efficacy and safety of vildagliptin and gliclazide in combination with metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone: a 52-week, randomized study [J].
Filozof, C. ;
Gautier, J. -F. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (03) :318-326
[9]  
Food and Drug Administration, GUID IND DI IN PRESS
[10]   Vildagliptin in combination with pioglitazone improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes failing thiazolidinedione monotherapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled study [J].
Garber, A. J. ;
Schweizer, A. ;
Baron, M. A. ;
Rochotte, E. ;
Dejager, S. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2007, 9 (02) :166-174