Accuracy of self-reported smoking status among participants in a chemoprevention trial

被引:49
作者
Martínez, ME
Reid, M
Jiang, RY
Einspahr, J
Alberts, DS
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Arizona Canc Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zucherman Arizona Coll Publ Hlth, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[3] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Div Canc Prevent & Populat Sci, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
cotinine; smoking; sensitivity; specificity; tobacco;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.006
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Exposure to tobacco products is readily assessed through self- or interview-administered questionnaires. Degree of misreporting among participants in chemoprevention trials is unknown. We assessed the level of discrepancy between self-reported smoking exposure and plasma cotinine among participants in a chemoprevention trial. Methods. Analyses were conducted among 824 men and women who participated in a dietary trial of adenoma recurrence. Smoking exposure was ascertained through self-administered questionnaires at three time-points. Plasma cotinine was measured by gas chromatography among 283 never, 446 former and 95 current self-reported smokers. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using various plasma cotinine cut-points. Results. Degree of misclassification for self-reported current smokers was minor (0-3%), regardless of cotinine cut-point used. Using a cut-point of 20 ng/ml, which takes into account exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among nonsmokers, sensitivity and specificity were 98.9% and 80.2%, respectively. Conclusions. These data indicate that degree of misreport for current smokers is extremely low; however, approximately 20% of self-reported never smokers misreport their exposure, suggesting that validation of self-report is needed for these individuals. (C) 2004 The Institute For Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 497
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Martínez, ME ;
Roe, DJ ;
Guillén-Rodríguez, JM ;
Marshall, JR ;
van Leeuwen, JB ;
Reid, ME ;
Ritenbaugh, C ;
Vargas, PA ;
Bhattacharyya, AB ;
Earnest, DL ;
Sampliner, RE ;
Parish, D ;
Koonce, K ;
Fales, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (16) :1156-1162
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Reducing tobacco use: A report of the surgeon general
[3]   A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas [J].
Baron, JA ;
Cole, BF ;
Sandler, RS ;
Haile, RW ;
Ahnen, D ;
Bresalier, R ;
McKeown-Eyssen, G ;
Summers, RW ;
Rothstein, R ;
Burke, CA ;
Snover, DC ;
Church, TR ;
Allen, JI ;
Beach, M ;
Beck, GJ ;
Bond, JH ;
Byers, T ;
Greenberg, ER ;
Mandel, JS ;
Marcon, N ;
Mott, LA ;
Pearson, L ;
Saibil, F ;
van Stolk, RU .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (10) :891-899
[4]  
Benowitz N L, 1983, NIDA Res Monogr, V48, P6
[5]   Factors associated with discrepancies between self-reports on cigarette smoking and measured serum cotinine levels among persons aged 17 years or older - Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 [J].
Caraballo, RS ;
Giovino, GA ;
Pechacek, TF ;
Mowery, PD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 153 (08) :807-814
[6]  
*CDCP, 2001, NAT REP HUM EXP ENV, V33
[7]  
JARVIS M, 1984, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V38, P335, DOI 10.1136/jech.38.4.335
[8]   COMPARISON OF TESTS USED TO DISTINGUISH SMOKERS FROM NONSMOKERS [J].
JARVIS, MJ ;
TUNSTALLPEDOE, H ;
FEYERABEND, C ;
VESEY, C ;
SALOOJEE, Y .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1987, 77 (11) :1435-1438
[9]  
JARVIS MJ, 1992, BRIT J ADDICT, V87, P111
[10]  
Martínez ME, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P813