Second-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the RIBBON-2 trial

被引:107
作者
Brufsky, Adam [1 ]
Valero, Vicente [2 ]
Tiangco, Beatrice [3 ]
Dakhil, Shaker [4 ]
Brize, Arija [5 ]
Rugo, Hope S. [6 ]
Rivera, Ragene [7 ]
Duenne, Anja [8 ]
Bousfoul, Naima [8 ]
Yardley, Denise A. [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Unit 1354, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Philippine Gen Hosp, Manila, Philippines
[4] Wichita Community Clin Oncol Program, Wichita, KS USA
[5] Riga Eastern Univ Hosp, Latvian Oncol Ctr, Riga, Latvia
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[7] US Oncol, El Paso, TX USA
[8] F Hoffmann La Roche & Co Ltd, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
[9] Sarah Cannon Res Inst, Nashville, TN USA
[10] Tennessee Oncol PLLC, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
Angiogenesis; Bevacizumab; Metastatic breast cancer; Second-line chemotherapy; Triple-negative breast cancer; Vascular endothelial growth factor; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; PHASE-III TRIAL; CHEMOTHERAPY; CAPECITABINE; COMBINATION; TNBC;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-012-2008-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) typically have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. To determine the impact of combining bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic TNBC, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis of the randomized phase 3 RIBBON-2 trial. RIBBON-2 enrolled patients with metastatic breast cancer that had progressed on first-line non-bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. After selection of chemotherapy (taxane, gemcitabine, capecitabine, or vinorelbine), patients were randomized 2:1 to receive chemotherapy with either bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Of 684 patients treated in RIBBON-2, 159 (23%) had TNBC. Baseline characteristics were reasonably balanced in the two treatment groups. The majority received taxane chemotherapy. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.494 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.74; P = 0.0006]. Median PFS was 6.0 months with bevacizumab-chemotherapy versus 2.7 months with chemotherapy alone. Median OS was 17.9 versus 12.6 months, respectively (HR 0.624, 95% CI 0.39-1.007; P = 0.0534). ORR was 41 versus 18%, respectively (P = 0.0078). The safety profile was consistent with the overall study population and previous phase 3 trials of bevacizumab. Patients with metastatic TNBC derived significant PFS and response benefits from the combination of bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy. Despite the small sample size and immature data, there was a trend toward improved OS.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1075
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Awada A, 2010, ANN ONCOL, V21, P5
[2]  
Baselga J., 2010, Cancer Res, V70, p95s
[3]   RIBBON-2: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy for Second-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer [J].
Brufsky, Adam M. ;
Hurvitz, Sara ;
Perez, Edith ;
Swamy, Raji ;
Valero, Vicente ;
O'Neill, Vincent ;
Rugo, Hope S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (32) :4286-4293
[4]   Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence [J].
Dent, Rebecca ;
Trudeau, Maureen ;
Pritchard, Kathleen I. ;
Hanna, Wedad M. ;
Kahn, Harriet K. ;
Sawka, Carol A. ;
Lickley, Lavina A. ;
Rawlinson, Ellen ;
Sun, Ping ;
Narod, Steven A. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (15) :4429-4434
[5]   Triple-negative breast cancer-current status and future directions [J].
Gluz, O. ;
Liedtke, C. ;
Gottschalk, N. ;
Pusztai, L. ;
Nitz, U. ;
Harbeck, N. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (12) :1913-1927
[6]   Independent Review of E2100: A Phase III Trial of Bevacizumab Plus Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer [J].
Gray, Robert ;
Bhattacharya, Suman ;
Bowden, Christopher ;
Miller, Kathy ;
Comis, Robert L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (30) :4966-4972
[7]   Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Role of Antiangiogenic Agents [J].
Greenberg, Sally ;
Rugo, Hope S. .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (01) :33-38
[8]   What is triple-negative breast cancer? [J].
Irvin, William J., Jr. ;
Carey, Lisa A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (18) :2799-2805
[9]   Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies [J].
Lehmann, Brian D. ;
Bauer, Joshua A. ;
Chen, Xi ;
Sanders, Melinda E. ;
Chakravarthy, A. Bapsi ;
Shyr, Yu ;
Pietenpol, Jennifer A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2011, 121 (07) :2750-2767
[10]   Phase III Study of Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel Compared With Placebo Plus Docetaxel for the First-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer [J].
Miles, David W. ;
Chan, Arlene ;
Dirix, Luc Y. ;
Cortes, Javier ;
Pivot, Xavier ;
Tomczak, Piotr ;
Delozier, Thierry ;
Sohn, Joo Hyuk ;
Provencher, Louise ;
Puglisi, Fabio ;
Harbeck, Nadia ;
Steger, Guenther G. ;
Schneeweiss, Andreas ;
Wardley, Andrew M. ;
Chlistalla, Andreas ;
Romieu, Gilles .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (20) :3239-3247