Access to Orphan Drugs: A Comprehensive Review of Legislations, Regulations and Policies in 35 Countries

被引:192
作者
Gammie, Todd [1 ]
Lu, Christine Y. [2 ,3 ]
Babar, Zaheer Ud-Din [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Boston, MA USA
关键词
RARE DISEASES; MEDICINAL PRODUCTS; REIMBURSEMENT; EUROPE; CHALLENGES; BULGARIA; TIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0140002
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
070301 [无机化学]; 070403 [天体物理学]; 070507 [自然资源与国土空间规划学]; 090105 [作物生产系统与生态工程];
摘要
Objective To review existing regulations and policies utilised by countries to enable patient access to orphan drugs. Methods A review of the literature (1998 to 2014) was performed to identify relevant, peer-reviewed articles. Using content analysis, we synthesised regulations and policies for access to orphan drugs by type and by country. Results Fifty seven articles and 35 countries were included in this review. Six broad categories of regulation and policy instruments were identified: national orphan drug policies, orphan drug designation, marketing authorization, incentives, marketing exclusivity, and pricing and reimbursement. The availability of orphan drugs depends on individual country's legislation and regulations including national orphan drug policies, orphan drug designation, marketing authorization, marketing exclusivity and incentives such as tax credits to ensure research, development and marketing. The majority of countries (27/35) had in place orphan drug legislation. Access to orphan drugs depends on individual country's pricing and reimbursement policies, which varied widely between countries. High prices and insufficient evidence often limit orphan drugs from meeting the traditional health technology assessment criteria, especially cost-effectiveness, which may influence access. Conclusions Overall many countries have implemented a combination of legislations, regulations and policies for orphan drugs in the last two decades. While these may enable the availability and access to orphan drugs, there are critical differences between countries in terms of
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]
Aagaard L, 2014, Orphan Drugs: Research and Reviews, P39, DOI [10.2147/ODRR.S58268, DOI 10.2147/ODRR.S58268]
[2]
Angelis A, 2014, HLTH POLICY
[3]
Orphan drugs: pricing, reimbursement and patient access [J].
Barak, Adam ;
Nandi, Jyoti Shankar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTHCARE MARKETING, 2011, 5 (04) :299-317
[4]
Availability of and Access to Orphan Drugs An International Comparison of Pharmaceutical Treatments for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Fabry Disease, Hereditary Angioedema and Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia [J].
Blankart, Carl Rudolf ;
Stargardt, Tom ;
Schreyoegg, Jonas .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2011, 29 (01) :63-82
[5]
Boon W, 2014, HLTH POLICY
[6]
Does market exclusivity hinder the development of Follow-on Orphan Medicinal Products in Europe? [J].
Brabers, Anne E. M. ;
Moors, Ellen H. M. ;
van Weely, Sonja ;
de Vrueh, Remco L. A. .
ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2011, 6
[7]
What Is Wrong with Orphan Drug Policies? [J].
Cote, Andre ;
Keating, Bernard .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (08) :1185-1191
[8]
Issues surrounding orphan disease and orphan drug policies in Europe [J].
Denis A. ;
Mergaert L. ;
Fostier C. ;
Cleemput I. ;
Simoens S. .
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2010, 8 (5) :343-350
[9]
A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets [J].
Denis, Alain ;
Mergaert, Lut ;
Fostier, Christel ;
Cleemput, Irina ;
Simoens, Steven .
HEALTH POLICY, 2010, 97 (2-3) :173-179
[10]
Orphan drugs policies: a suitable case for treatment [J].
Drummond, Michael ;
Towse, Adrian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2014, 15 (04) :335-340