Reliability of a Measure of Total Lumbar Spine Range of Motion in Individuals with Low Back Pain

被引:5
作者
Al Zoubi, Fadi M. [1 ,2 ]
Preuss, Richard A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Sch Phys & Occupat Therapy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Rech Interdisciplinaire Readaptat CRIR, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
generalizability theory; spine kinematics; outcome measures; MAXIMAL ISOMETRIC STRENGTH; CLINICAL-PREDICTION RULE; VALIDITY; IMPAIRMENT; DISABILITY; MOVEMENTS; FLEXION;
D O I
10.1123/jab.29.6.670
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
Measuring lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) using multiple movements is impractical for clinical research, because finding statistically significant effects requires a large proportion of subjects to present with the same impairment. The purpose of this study was to develop a single measure representing the total available lumbar ROM. Twenty participants with low back pain performed three series of eight lumbar spine movements, in each of two sessions. For each series, an ellipse and a cubic spline were fit to the end-range positions, measured based on the position of the twelfth thoracic vertebra in the transverse plane of the sacrum. The area of each shape provides a measure of the total available ROM, whereas their center reflects the movements' symmetry. Using generalizability theory, the index of dependability for the area and anterior-posterior center position was found to be 0.90, but was slightly lower for the mediolateral center position. Slightly better values were achieved using the spline-fitting approach. Further analysis also indicated that excellent reliability, and acceptable minimal detectable change values, would be achieved with a single testing session. These data indicate that the proposed measure provides a reliable and easily interpretable measure of total lumbar spine ROM.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 677
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]
American Medical Association, 1993, AM MED ASS GUID EV P, P112
[3]
Assessment of combined movements of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic and low back pain subjects using a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking system [J].
Barrett, CJ ;
Singer, KP ;
Day, R .
MANUAL THERAPY, 1999, 4 (02) :94-99
[4]
A taxonomy for responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Katz, JN ;
Wright, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) :1204-1217
[5]
Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain [J].
Childs, JD ;
Piva, SR ;
Fritz, JM .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) :1331-1334
[6]
Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians and the American pain society [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Qaseem, Amir ;
Snow, Vincenza ;
Casey, Donald ;
Cross, J. Thomas, Jr. ;
Shekelle, Paul ;
Owens, Douglas K. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 147 (07) :478-491
[7]
The Oswestry Disability Index [J].
Fairbank, JCT ;
Pynsent, PB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (22) :2940-2952
[8]
Direct least square fitting of ellipses [J].
Fitzgibbon, A ;
Pilu, M ;
Fisher, RB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1999, 21 (05) :476-480
[9]
Fleiss R.L., 1986, The design and analysis of clinical experiments, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118032923.CH1
[10]
A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation [J].
Flynn, T ;
Fritz, J ;
Whitman, J ;
Wainner, R ;
Magel, J ;
Rendeiro, D ;
Butler, B ;
Garber, M ;
Allison, S .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (24) :2835-2843