Influence of novel and habituated testing conditions on cocaine sensitization

被引:15
作者
Wise, RA [1 ]
Gingras, MA [1 ]
Amit, Z [1 ]
机构
[1] CONCORDIA UNIV,CTR STUDIES BEHAV NEUROBIOL,MONTREAL,PQ H3G 1M8,CANADA
关键词
cocaine; sensitization; reverse tolerance;
D O I
10.1016/0014-2999(96)00218-X
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Female Swiss-Webster mice were treated daily for 10 days with cocaine (15 mg/kg i.p.) followed by 10 days with saline or ethanol (1.6 g/kg i.p.) or the reverse; following each injection in the experimental conditions locomotion was quantified in photocell cages. In animals given cocaine first, cocaine-induced locomotion was initially high and did not increase further with successive injections. In animals given prior saline or ethanol treatments, cocaine-induced locomotion was initially low but increased with successive cocaine treatments. There was no evidence of sensitization to the locomotor-stimulating effects of ethanol or of cross-sensitization between ethanol and cocaine. With respect to subsequent cocaine sensitization. the essential feature of prior saline or ethanol treatment appeared to be the handling and injection experience itself; a control group receiving prior saline injections in the home cage also showed a low level of cocaine-induced locomotion on the first day of cocaine testing but increasing locomotion with repeated cocaine testing. Thus, cocaine sensitization, rather than a progressive augmentation of motor function, may reflect a progressive reversal of the behavioral suppression caused by habituation to aspects of the testing situation or to some form of situational anxiety that precludes normal exploratory responses.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 19
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   INTERCHANGEABILITY OF STRESS AND AMPHETAMINE IN SENSITIZATION [J].
ANTELMAN, SM ;
EICHLER, AJ ;
BLACK, CA ;
KOCAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4428) :329-331
[2]  
AYD F J Jr, 1957, J Clin Exp Psychopathol, V18, P342
[3]   TIME-DOSE RELATIONSHIPS FOR LOCOMOTOR ACTIVITY EFFECTS OF MORPHINE AFTER ACUTE OR REPEATED TREATMENT [J].
BABBINI, M ;
DAVIS, WM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1972, 46 (02) :213-&
[4]   CHRONIC COCAINE ADMINISTRATION SENSITIZES BEHAVIORAL BUT NOT NEUROENDOCRINE RESPONSES [J].
BOROWSKY, B ;
KUHN, CM .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 543 (02) :301-306
[5]  
CRABBE J, 1982, J COMP PHYSL PSYCHOL
[6]   PHARMACOLOGICAL AND ANATOMICAL SUBSTRATES OF AMPHETAMINE RESPONSE IN RAT [J].
CREESE, I ;
IVERSEN, SD .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1975, 83 (03) :419-436
[7]   GENETIC-DIFFERENCES IN THE REWARDING AND ACTIVATING EFFECTS OF MORPHINE AND ETHANOL [J].
CUNNINGHAM, CL ;
NIEHUS, DR ;
MALOTT, DH ;
PRATHER, LK .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 107 (2-3) :385-393
[8]   CONDITIONED ACTIVATION INDUCED BY ETHANOL - ROLE IN SENSITIZATION AND CONDITIONED PLACE PREFERENCE [J].
CUNNINGHAM, CL ;
NOBLE, D .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1992, 43 (01) :307-313
[9]   BEHAVIORAL CROSS-SENSITIZATION BETWEEN COCAINE AND ENKEPHALIN IN THE A10 DOPAMINE REGION [J].
DUMARS, LA ;
RODGER, LD ;
KALIVAS, PW .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1988, 27 (01) :87-91
[10]  
ELLINWOOD EH, 1975, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V10, P3