Anterior revision of a dislocated ProDisc prosthesis at the L4-5 level

被引:8
作者
Jeon, Sang Hyeop [2 ]
Choi, Won Gyu [1 ]
Lee, Sang-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Wooridul Spine Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul 135100, South Korea
[2] Wooridul Spine Hosp, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Seoul 135100, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2008年 / 21卷 / 06期
关键词
failed lumbar ProDisc; anterior revision surgery; vascular injury;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181633a32
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: A case report describing our experience with anterior revision surgery for a dislocated ProDisc artificial disc at the L4-5 level, 2.5 years after the initial surgery. Objective: To highlight the difficulties and risks associated with the use of a repeat anterior approach for the revision of a ProDisc that has failed at the L4-5 level. Summary of Background Data: As the ProDisc has a central vertical keel, more intensive vascular mobilization is required to remove the dislocated implant during surgery than that required in patients who must undergo a revision of the SB-Charite disc. To our knowledge, no prior report addresses whether the anterior removal of a ProDisc at the L4-5 level is possible in patients with severe retroperitoneal fibrosis. Methods: We describe our surgical experience with the anterior revision of a lumbar ProDisc that failed at the L4-5 level. Revision surgery (anterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation) was performed 2.5 years after the initial surgery because of the anterior dislocation of the artificial disc after the patient had engaged in heavy lifting. The operation was performed with a repeat retroperitoneal approach. The multiple venous injuries that occurred intraoperatively were well controlled with a 510 polypropylene (Prolene) suture, but the patient lost a significant amount of blood (3800mL) during surgery. Results: The patient recovered from surgery without sequelae, and her preoperative symptoms resolved. Conclusions: A ProDisc revision case at L4-5 level must be attempted with preparation of available venous balloon catheter for emergent bleeding control, cell saver, pulse oxymeter on great toe, and ureteral catheter. In our opinion, usage of adhesion barrier material should be considered in anterior lumbar surgery to make revision exposure easier and safer.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 450
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]
Complications and strategies for revision surgery in total disc replacement [J].
Bertagnoli, R ;
Zigler, J ;
Karg, A ;
Voigt, S .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 36 (03) :389-+
[2]
Kostuik John P, 2004, Spine J, V4, p289S, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.021
[3]
Bilateral pedicle fractures following anterior dislocation of the polyethylene inlay of a ProDisc® artificial disc replacement -: A case report of an unusual complication [J].
Mathew, P ;
Blackman, M ;
Redla, S ;
Hussein, AA .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) :E311-E314
[4]
PELOZA J, 2007, SPINAL ARTHROPLASTY, P385
[5]
PELOZA J, 2005, WORLD SPIN 3 RIO JAN
[6]
Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc - Report of two cases [J].
Shim, CS ;
Lee, SC ;
Maeng, DH ;
Lee, SH .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2005, 18 (05) :465-469
[7]
Lumbar total disc replacement - Seven to eleven-year follow-up [J].
Tripiano, P ;
Huang, RC ;
Girardi, FP ;
Cammisa, FP ;
Marnay, T .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (03) :490-496
[8]
Zigler Jack E, 2004, Spine J, V4, p260S, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.018