Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers

被引:293
作者
Bain, Paul G. [1 ]
Hornsey, Matthew J. [1 ]
Bongiorno, Renata [1 ]
Jeffries, Carla [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
COMPETENCE; POLICY; WARMTH;
D O I
10.1038/NCLIMATE1532
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A sizeable (and growing) proportion of the public in Western democracies deny the existence of anthropogenic climate change(1,2). It is commonly assumed that convincing deniers that climate change is real is necessary for them to act pro-environmentally(3,4). However, the likelihood of 'conversion' using scientific evidence is limited because these attitudes increasingly reflect ideological positions(5,6). An alternative approach is to identify outcomes of mitigation efforts that deniers find important. People have strong interests in the welfare of their society, so deniers may act in ways supporting mitigation efforts where they believe these efforts will have positive societal effects. In Study 1, climate change deniers (N = 155) intended to act more pro-environmentally where they thought climate change action would create a society where. people are more considerate and caring, and where there is greater economic/technological development. Study 2 (N = 347) replicated this experimentally, showing that framing climate change action as increasing consideration for others, or improving economic/technological development, led to greater pro-environmental action intentions than a frame emphasizing avoiding the risks of climate change. To motivate deniers' pro-environmental actions, communication should focus on how mitigation efforts can promote a better society, rather than focusing on the reality of climate change and averting its risks.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 603
页数:4
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Australians' Views of Climate Change
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NATURE CLIM CHANGE, V1, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Global warming's six Americas, May 2011
[4]   Framing theory [J].
Chong, Dennis ;
Druckman, James N. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 10 :103-126
[5]   A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition [J].
Fiske, ST ;
Cuddy, AJC ;
Glick, P ;
Xu, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 82 (06) :878-902
[6]  
Hennessy K., 2007, IPCC, P507
[7]   SOCIOLOGY The growing climate divide [J].
Hoffman, Andrew J. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 1 (04) :195-196
[8]   Talking Past Each Other? Cultural Framing of Skeptical and Convinced Logics in the Climate Change Debate [J].
Hoffman, Andrew J. .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 24 (01) :3-33
[9]   Meet the humanities [J].
Hulme, Mike .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 1 (04) :177-179
[10]   The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism [J].
Jacques, Peter J. ;
Dunlap, Riley E. ;
Freeman, Mark .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2008, 17 (03) :349-385