Endometrial thickness as a test for endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding

被引:143
作者
Tabor, A [2 ]
Watt, HC
Wald, NJ
机构
[1] St Bartholomews & Royal London Sch Med & Dent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Dept Environm & Prevent Med, London, England
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01771-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of endometrial thickness measurement as a test for endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding (symptomatic women). DATA SOURCES: We conducted a literature search using the MEDLINE database from 1991 to 1997, and the key words "vaginal ultrasonography" and "endometrial thickness measurement." The review was limited to original research reports written in English, concerning symptomatic women having vaginal ultrasonography before a diagnostic test and not receiving tamoxifen. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 48 studies were identified. A questionnaire was sent to the corresponding author of each paper requesting supplementary information. Data were included in our analysis if the corresponding author was able to supply information on the median endometrial thickness in unaffected symptomatic women and the endometrial thickness values in affected women. Nine studies were thus included in our meta-analysis, representing 3483 women without endometrial cancer and 330 women with endometrial cancer. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The median endometrial thickness in women with endometrial cancer was 3.7 times that in unaffected women at the same center, and with the same menopausal status and same hormone replacement therapy use category. The detection rate was 63% (95% confidence interval 58, 69) for a 10% false-positive rate, or 96% (95% confidence interval 94, 98) for a 50% false-positive rate. CONCLUSION: Endometrial thickness measurement in symptomatic women does not reduce the need for invasive diagnostic testing because 4% of the endometrial cancers would still be missed with a false-positive rate as high as 50%. (Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:663-70. (C) 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 670
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] TRANSVAGINAL US APPEARANCE OF ENDOMETRIAL ABNORMALITIES
    ATRI, M
    NAZARNIA, S
    ALDIS, AE
    REINHOLD, C
    BRET, PM
    KINTZEN, G
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 1994, 14 (03) : 483 - 492
  • [2] BAKOS O, 1995, MATURITAS, V20, P181
  • [3] Bombieri L., 1995, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Abingdon), V15, P421, DOI 10.3109/01443619509009182
  • [4] Botsis D., 1992, Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, V19, P189
  • [5] BOURNE TH, 1991, GYNECOL ONCOL, V40, P253
  • [6] TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHY AND HYSTEROSCOPY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL BLEEDING
    CACCIATORE, B
    RAMSAY, T
    LEHTOVIRTA, P
    YLOSTALO, P
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 73 (05) : 413 - 416
  • [7] ENDOMETRIAL ASSESSMENT BY TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHY AND HISTOLOGICAL-FINDINGS AFTER D-AND-C IN WOMEN WITH POSTMENOPAUSAL BLEEDING
    CONOSCENTI, G
    MEIR, YJ
    FISCHERTAMARO, L
    MAIERON, A
    NATALE, R
    DOTTAVIO, G
    RUSTICO, M
    MANDRUZZATO, G
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 6 (02) : 108 - 115
  • [8] The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometrial abnormalities
    Dijkhuizen, FPHLJ
    Brolmann, HAM
    Potters, AE
    Bongers, MY
    Heintz, APM
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (03) : 345 - 349
  • [9] EVALUATION OF ENDOMETRIAL THICKNESS MEASURED BY ENDOVAGINAL ULTRASOUND IN WOMEN WITH POSTMENOPAUSAL BLEEDING
    DORUM, A
    KRISTENSEN, GB
    LANGEBREKKE, A
    SORNES, T
    SKAAR, O
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 72 (02) : 116 - 119
  • [10] A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND DIAGNOSTIC HYSTEROSCOPY IN THE EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH ABNORMAL UTERINE BLEEDING - CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
    EMANUEL, MH
    VERDEL, MJ
    WAMSTEKER, K
    LAMMES, FB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (02) : 547 - 552