Measurement of abdominal fat by magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry in non-obese men and women

被引:98
作者
Kamel, EG [1 ]
McNeill, G
Han, TS
Smith, FW
Avenell, A
Davidson, L
Tothill, P
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Med & Therapeut, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Biomed Phys, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Med Phys, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
body fat distribution; L2-L3; obesity; methodology; waist circumference; waist-to-hip ratio;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ijo.0800904
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was a better predictor of abdominal fat, measured by magnetic: resonance imaging (MRI) at the level of L2-L3, than anthropometric measurements in non-obese men and non-obese women. DESIGN: Observational, cross sectional study. SUBJECTS: 34 healthy subjects (17 men and 17 women) aged 20-53y with a body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m(2). MEASUREMENTS: Fat distribution parameters including waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR); intra abdominal fat (IAF) by MRI; and central abdominal fat (CAF) by DEXA. RESULTS: Measurement of IAF by MRI, was highly correlated to the CAF measured by DEXA. In men, both waist circumference and WHR had similar correlation to IAF as DEXA. In women, waist circumference was less well correlated with IAF than DEXA, and the WHR had a weaker non significant correlation with IAF. CONCLUSIONS: In non obese men; DEXA, waist circumference and WHR can predict IAF equally well, while in non obese women, DEXA is superior to waist circumference and much better than WHR.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 692
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Prediction of total subcutaneous abdominal, intraperitoneal, and retroperitoneal adipose tissue masses in men by a single axial magnetic resonance imaging slice [J].
Abate, N ;
Garg, A ;
Coleman, R ;
Grundy, SM ;
Peshock, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1997, 65 (02) :403-408
[2]
ABATE N, 1994, J LIPID RES, V35, P1490
[3]
OBESITY - NEW INSIGHT INTO THE ANTHROPOMETRIC CLASSIFICATION OF FAT DISTRIBUTION SHOWN BY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
ASHWELL, M ;
COLE, TJ ;
DIXON, AK .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 290 (6483) :1692-1694
[4]
BJORNTORP IP, 1992, OBESITY, P579
[5]
Carey DGP, 1996, INT J OBESITY, V20, P722
[6]
DUMIN JVG, 1974, BR J NUTR, V32, P77
[7]
SUBCUTANEOUS AND VISCERAL FAT DISTRIBUTION ACCORDING TO SEX, AGE, AND OVERWEIGHT, EVALUATED BY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
ENZI, G ;
GASPARO, M ;
BIONDETTI, PR ;
FIORE, D ;
SEMISA, M ;
ZURLO, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1986, 44 (06) :739-746
[8]
TOTAL AND SUBCUTANEOUS ADIPOSE-TISSUE IN WOMEN - THE MEASUREMENT OF DISTRIBUTION AND ACCURATE PREDICTION OF QUANTITY BY USING MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
FOWLER, PA ;
FULLER, MF ;
GLASBEY, CA ;
FOSTER, MA ;
CAMERON, GG ;
MCNEILL, G ;
MAUGHAN, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1991, 54 (01) :18-25
[9]
Garrow JS, 1974, Energy Balance and Obesity in Man
[10]
Relationship between volumes and areas from single transverse scans of intra-abdominal fat measured by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Han, TS ;
Kelly, IE ;
Walsh, K ;
Greene, RME ;
Lean, MEJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 1997, 21 (12) :1161-1166