Sex and the Internet: Gay men, risk reduction and serostatus

被引:84
作者
Davis, Mark
Hart, Graham
Bolding, Graham
Sherr, Lorraine
Elford, Jonathan
机构
[1] City Univ London, St Bartholomew Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Inst Hlth Sci, London EC1V 0HB, England
[2] MRC, Social & Publ Hlth Sci Res Unit, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[3] UCL Royal Free & Univ Coll, Sch Med, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Internet; HIV; gay men; identity;
D O I
10.1080/13691050500526126
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Access to the Internet has increased dramatically over the past decade as has its use for meeting sexual partners (e-dating), particularly among gay men. Between June 2002 and January 2004, 128 gay/bisexual men living in London were interviewed one-to-one about their experience of e-dating, sexual risk and HIV prevention. The men were recruited both online (through the Internet) and offline (in clinics and the community); 32 men were HIV-positive, 59 HIV-negative, while 13 had never had an HIV test. A key finding was that both identity as well as anonymity arc vital to e-dating. Through a process of online filtering and sero-sorting, HIV-positive men are able to meet other positive men for anal sex without condoms. While this does not present a risk of HIV transmission to an uninfected person it does have implications for the potential transmission of other STIs such as syphilis and LGV. Through e-dating, HIV-positive gay men can also avoid abuse, discrimination and sexual rejection. Our findings do not support the suggestion that the attraction of e-dating is that it affords absolute anonymity. We found that the gradual expression of identity is vital for e-dating among gay men. Internet-based HIV prevention campaigns need to take account of the different ways in which gay reflexively manage aspects of their identity online.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 174
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Constructing the neoliberal sexual actor: Responsibility and care of the self in the discourse of barebackers [J].
Adam, BD .
CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY, 2005, 7 (04) :333-346
[2]  
[Anonymous], NET BENEFITS GAY MEN
[3]   Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].
Barbour, RS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1115-1117
[4]   Men who have met sex partners via the Internet: Prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention [J].
Benotsch, EG ;
Kalichman, S ;
Cage, M .
ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 31 (02) :177-183
[5]   Gay men who look for sex on the Internet: is there more HIV/STI risk with online partners? [J].
Bolding, G ;
Davis, M ;
Hart, G ;
Sherr, L ;
Elford, J .
AIDS, 2005, 19 (09) :961-968
[6]   Use of gay Internet sites and views about online health promotion among men who have sex with men [J].
Bolding, G ;
Davis, M ;
Sherr, L ;
Hart, G ;
Elford, J .
AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2004, 16 (08) :993-1001
[7]   Soliciting sex on the Internet -: What are the risks for sexually transmitted diseases and HIV? [J].
Bull, SS ;
McFarlane, M .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2000, 27 (09) :545-550
[8]  
Carballo-Dieguez A, 2001, J SEX EDUC THER, V26, P225
[9]  
Castells M., 2000, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, V2nd
[10]   Sexuality on the Internet: From sexual exploration to pathological expression [J].
Cooper, A ;
Scherer, CR ;
Boies, SC ;
Gordon, BL .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1999, 30 (02) :154-164