Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance

被引:47
作者
Bendeus, M [1 ]
Hägg, U [1 ]
Rabie, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mod.2002.122177
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate growth and treatment changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with a combined headgear-activator appliance. The sample consisted of 20 consecutive male patients treated with headgear-activator. Their compliance was checked after 2 months of treatment, and 3 patients dropped out. Lateral cephalograms, obtained 6 months before treatment, at the start of treatment, after 6 and 12 months of treatment, and 24 months after treatment, were analyzed by the method of Pancherz. The results disclosed that during growth, on average, overjet, molar relationship, and jaw-base relationship improved, and the mandibular incisors became retruded; the changes were statistically significant over a 2-year period. There was no significant change in the overbite, During the 12 months of treatment, there was no maxillary forward growth, and the jaw relationship improved (P<.001) because of forward growth of the mandible (P<.001). The molar relationship and the overbite improved (P<.001). Significant treatment effects included reduction in overjet (P<.001) and overbite (P<.01), and improvement of jaw-base (P<.05) and molar (P<.001) relationships. There was significant restraint of maxillary forward growth (P<.05). The eruption of the maxillary incisors and molars was restrained (P<.05). The average basic growth pattern in Class II Division 1 malocclusion resulted in small favorable changes in overjet, molar relationship, and jaw-base relationship. The main effect of the headgear-activator appliance was a favorable dental change, limited to restraint of maxillary forward growth but not affecting the vertical dimension.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 384
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
The initial effects of the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions with the van Beek activator compared with the effects of the Herren activator and an activator-headgear combination [J].
Altenburger, E ;
Ingervall, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1998, 20 (04) :389-397
[2]
Bass N M, 1982, Br J Orthod, V9, P3
[5]
BJORK A, 1969, AM J ORTHOD, V55, P578
[6]
BJORK A, 1947, THESIS LUND, P180
[7]
BJORK ARNE, 1963, JOUR DENT RES, V42, P400, DOI 10.1177/00220345630420014701
[8]
Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: A comparative study [J].
Cura, N ;
Sarac, M ;
Ozturk, Y ;
Surmeli, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 110 (01) :36-45
[10]
DERMAUT L R, 1992, European Journal of Orthodontics, V14, P140