A randomized controlled trial comparing standard- and low-dose strategies for transfusion of platelets (SToP) to patients with thrombocytopenia

被引:121
作者
Heddle, Nancy M. [1 ,2 ]
Cook, Richard J. [3 ]
Tinmouth, Alan [2 ,4 ]
Kouroukis, C. Tom [1 ]
Hervig, Tor [5 ]
Klapper, Ellen [6 ]
Brandwein, Joseph M. [7 ]
Szczepiorkowski, Zbigniew M. [8 ]
AuBuchon, James P. [8 ]
Barty, Rebecca L. [1 ]
Lee, Ker-Ai [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] Canadian Blood Serv, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[4] Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Haukeland Hosp, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[6] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
关键词
HEMATOLOGY ANALYZERS; BLEEDING RISK; PROPHYLAXIS; APHERESIS; ACCURACY; COUNT;
D O I
10.1182/blood-2008-09-178236
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A noninferiority study was performed comparing low-dose and standard-dose prophylactic platelet transfusions. A double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed in 6 sites in 3 countries. Thrombocytopenic adults requiring prophylactic platelet transfusion were randomly allocated to standard-dose (300600 x 10(9) platelets/product) or low-dose (150- < 300 x 10(9) platelets/product) platelets. The primary outcome (World Health Organization [WHO] bleeding >= grade 2) was assessed daily through clinical examination, patient interview, and chart review. A WHO grade was assigned through adjudication. The Data Safety Monitoring Board stopped the study because the difference in the grade 4 bleeding reached the prespecified threshold of 5%. At this time, 129 patients had been randomized and 119 patients were included in the analysis (58 low dose; 61 standard dose). Three patients in the low-dose arm (5.2%) had grade 4 bleeds compared with none in the standard-dose arm. WHO bleeding grade 2 or higher was 49.2% (30/61) in the standard-dose arm and 51.7% (30/58) in the low-dose group (relative risk [RR], 1.052; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.737-1.502). A higher rate of grade 4 bleeding in patients receiving low-dose prophylactic platelet transfusions resulted in this RCT being stopped. Whether this finding was due to chance or represents a real difference requires further investigation. These clinical studies are registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00420914. (Blood. 2009; 113: 1564-1573)
引用
收藏
页码:1564 / 1573
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   COX REGRESSION-MODEL FOR COUNTING-PROCESSES - A LARGE SAMPLE STUDY [J].
ANDERSEN, PK ;
GILL, RD .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1982, 10 (04) :1100-1120
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
[3]  
Cook RJ, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P911, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970430)16:8<911::AID-SIM544>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-I
[5]  
Cook RJ, 2007, STAT BIOL HEALTH, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-69810-6
[6]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[7]  
Diggle P. J, 2002, ANAL LONGITUDINAL DA
[8]   Prophylactic platelet transfusions from healthy apheresis platelet donors undergoing treatment with thrombopoietin [J].
Goodnough, LT ;
Kuter, DJ ;
McCullough, J ;
Slichter, SJ ;
DiPersio, J ;
Romo, J ;
Peterson, R ;
Smith, KJ ;
Raife, T ;
Tomita, D ;
Armstrong, S .
BLOOD, 2001, 98 (05) :1346-1351
[9]  
HANSON SR, 1985, BLOOD, V66, P1105
[10]   Controversy concerning platelet dose [J].
Heddle, N. M. .
ISBT SCIENCE SERIES, VOL 2, NO 1: STATE OF THE ART PRESENTATIONS, 2007, 2 (01) :220-225