Can the MMPI-2 validity scales detect depression feigned by experts?

被引:33
作者
Bagby, RM
Nicholson, RA
Buis, T
Bacchiochi, JR
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sect Personal & Psychopathol, Mood & Anxiety Program, Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth,Clarke Div, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
[2] Univ Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
[3] York Univ, N York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
malingering; depression; MMPI-2; validity scales; disability;
D O I
10.1177/107319110000700104
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Major depression is one of the most frequently presented disorders for claims of psychiatric disability. Evidence also suggests that many individuals making claims of disability exaggerate or even fabricate mental illness. These facts suggest that the detection of feigned depression is an important task in psychiatric disability claim assessments. In this study, the capacity of a number of MMPI-2 validity scales and indicators to detect feigned depression was examined. Twenty-three mental health professionals with specific expertise and significant experience in assessing and treating major depression were asked to complete the MMPI-2 as if they were suffering from major depression. The MMPI-2 protocols of this sample were compared to those of a sample of patients diagnosed with major depression. Results indicated that the validity scales F, back F (F-B), and the Dissimulation scale (Ds) were highly successful at distinguishing MMPI-2 protocols of feigned depression from bona fide depression. Replicating results from previous studies, however, F-B proved most effective, outperforming all other validity scales and indicators, including F and Ds. These findings suggest that even experts are unable to feign major depression successfully on the MMPI-2, and that the F-B scale might be the most effective indicator for detecting feigned depression.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J CONSULT PSYCHOL
[2]   An MMPI-2 infrequent response scale for use with psychopathological populations: The infrequency-psychopathology scale, F(p) [J].
Arbisi, PA ;
BenPorath, YS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (04) :424-431
[3]   Utility of the deceptive-subtle items in the detection of malingering [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Nicholson, R ;
Buis, T .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1998, 70 (03) :405-415
[4]   Detecting feigned depression and schizophrenia on the MMPI-2 [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Rogers, R ;
Buis, T ;
Nicholson, RA ;
Cameron, SL ;
Rector, NA ;
Schuller, DR ;
Seeman, MV .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1997, 68 (03) :650-664
[5]   DETECTION OF MALINGERING ON THE MMPI - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BERRY, DTR ;
BAER, RA ;
HARRIS, MJ .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1991, 11 (05) :585-598
[6]  
Butcher J.N., 1989, MANUAL ADM SCORING M
[7]   THE USE OF SUBTLE ITEMS IN DETECTING DECEPTION [J].
DANNENBAUM, SE ;
LANYON, RI .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1993, 61 (03) :501-510
[8]  
Gough H.G., 1950, J CONSULT PSYCHOL, V14, P408
[9]   Assessing dissimulation among social security disability income claimants [J].
Griffin, GAE ;
Normington, J ;
May, R ;
Glassmire, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 64 (06) :1425-1430
[10]  
KESSLER RC, 1994, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V51, P8