The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills

被引:86
作者
Prasad, SM [1 ]
Maniar, HS [1 ]
Soper, NJ [1 ]
Damiano, RJ [1 ]
Klingensmith, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
computer-assisted surgery; robotic surgery; learning curves; laparoscopy; training;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00871-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We hypothesized that laparoscopic tasks performed with ZEUS robotic assistance would be done with greater precision and with a different learning curve than when performed in a standard laparoscopic trainer. Methods: Participants were divided into the surgically experienced (n = 11) and the surgically naive (n = 17). Two laparoscopic tasks (bead transfer and rope pass) were repeated for five repetitions. Results: For all drills and participants, completion time and error rate decreased across the five repetitions for each platform. Precision averaged 97% for both platforms over all drills. For both groups, completion time for tasks was shorter on the laparoscopic platform. ZEUS allowed for greater consistency in performance. Conclusions: Compared with performance on a standard laparoscopic trainer, robotic assistance allows for increasing speed and consistency while maintaining precision over multiple repetitions. Understanding how robotics affects learning curves will allow for modifications in the training experience with this new technology. (C) 2002 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 707
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Damiano R J Jr, 2000, Adv Card Surg, V12, P37
[2]   Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills [J].
Derossis, AM ;
Fried, GM ;
Abrahamowicz, M ;
Sigman, HH ;
Barkun, JS ;
Meakins, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 175 (06) :482-487
[3]   Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study [J].
Falcone, T ;
Goldberg, JM ;
Margossian, H ;
Stevens, L .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (05) :1040-1042
[4]   Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator [J].
Fried, GM ;
Derossis, AM ;
Bothwell, J ;
Sigman, HH .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (11) :1077-1081
[5]   Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks [J].
Garcia-Ruiz, A ;
Gagner, M ;
Miller, JH ;
Steiner, CP ;
Hahn, JF .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (09) :957-961
[6]   Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft [J].
GarciaRuiz, A ;
Smedira, NG ;
Loop, FD ;
Hahn, JF ;
Miller, JH ;
Steiner, CP ;
Gagner, M .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 1997, 7 (05) :277-283
[7]   COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC VERSUS HUMAN LAPAROSCOPIC CAMERA CONTROL [J].
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
MOORE, RG ;
ADAMS, JB ;
PARTIN, AW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (06) :2134-2136
[8]   Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments [J].
Loulmet, D ;
Carpentier, A ;
d'Attellis, N ;
Berrebi, A ;
Cardon, C ;
Ponzio, O ;
Aupècle, B ;
Relland, JYM .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 118 (01) :4-10
[9]  
PAGNI S, 1997, ANN THORAC SURG, V63, P64