The Multifaceted Nature of Measurement Artifacts and Its Implications for Estimating Construct-Level Relationships

被引:83
作者
Le, Huy [1 ]
Schmidt, Frank L. [2 ]
Putka, Dan J.
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Tippie Coll Business, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
measurement error; reliability; construct-level relationships; disattenuation; structural equation modeling; SELF-REPORTED AFFECT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; METHOD VARIANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH; JOB INVOLVEMENT; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; PERCEPTIONS; COMMITMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/1094428107302900
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Measurement artifacts, including measurement errors and scale-specific factors, distort observed correlations between measures of psychological and organizational constructs. The authors discuss two alternative procedures, one using the generalized coefficient of equivalence and stability (GCES) and one based on structural equation modeling, to correct for the biasing effect of measurement artifacts in order to estimate construct-level relationships. Assumptions underlying the procedures are discussed and the degrees of biases resulting from violating the assumptions are examined by means of Monte Carlo simulation. They then propose an approach using cumulative knowledge in the literature about properties of measures of a construct to estimate the GCES. That approach can allow researchers to estimate relationships between constructs in most research situations. The authors apply the approach to estimate the GCES for overall job satisfaction, an important organizational construct.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 200
页数:36
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ORGAN RES METHODS
[2]   ASSESSING METHOD VARIANCE IN MULTITRAIT MULTIMETHOD MATRICES - THE CASE OF SELF-REPORTED AFFECT AND PERCEPTIONS AT WORK [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
YI, YJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (05) :547-560
[3]   How important is transient error in estimating reliability? Going beyond simulation studies [J].
Becker, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2000, 5 (03) :370-379
[4]  
BECKER TE, 1994, J MANAGE, V20, P625, DOI 10.1177/014920639402000306
[5]   An Index of Job Satisfaction [J].
Brayfield, Arthur H. ;
Rothe, Harold F. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1951, 35 (05) :307-311
[6]  
Brennan R.L., 2001, GENERALIZABILITY THE
[7]   DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION OF MEASURES OF JOB-SATISFACTION, JOB INVOLVEMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT [J].
BROOKE, PP ;
RUSSELL, DW ;
PRICE, JL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (02) :139-145
[8]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[9]  
Campbell J., 1982, J APPL PSYCHOL, V67, P691, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0077946
[10]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255