Validation and Calibration of ASCAT Using CMOD5.n

被引:105
作者
Verspeek, Jeroen [1 ]
Stoffelen, Ad [1 ]
Portabella, Marcos [2 ]
Bonekamp, Hans [3 ]
Anderson, Craig [3 ]
Saldana, Julia Figa [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst KNMI, NL-3732 GK De Bilt, Netherlands
[2] CSIC, UTM, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain
[3] European Org Exploitat Meteorol Satellites, D-64295 Darmstadt, Germany
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2010年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
ASCAT; backscatter; calibration; CMOD5; Metop; radar scattering; scatterometer; wind; SCATTEROMETER;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2009.2027896
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) onboard the Metop-A satellite became operational shortly after launch in 2006, and an absolute calibration using three transponders was achieved in November 2008. In this paper, we describe how the CMOD5.n ocean backscatter geophysical model function (GMF), which was derived using data from previous scatterometers onboard the European Remote Sensing 1 and 2 satellites (ERS-1 and ERS-2), was used to derive backscatter bias correction factors. The purpose is to remove the bias between ASCAT backscatter data and the CMOD5.n GMF output which allows these data to be used in place of ERS data in existing wind processing algorithms. The ASCAT Wind Data Processor, developed at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), applies the bias correction factors to ASCAT data and uses CMOD5.n to retrieve wind vectors in order to produce an operational wind product. This resulted in a stable and high-quality ASCAT wind product since February 2007. We validate this product by comparing it to the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) winds and buoy measurements. The bias correction factors indicate that ASCAT data and the GMF differ by roughly 0.3 dB below 55 degrees and up to 0.8 dB above 55 degrees. A possible explanation lies in CMOD5.n which has been poorly validated in this incidence angle regime. Validation of ASCAT data using the ocean calibration method confirms this result and also indicates that bias-corrected data are everywhere within 0.3 dB of CMOD5.n. The wind product validation shows an rms error of 1.3 m . s(-1) in wind speed and 16 degrees in wind direction when compared to ECMWF winds. This is better than the results achieved using ERS scatterometer data. Against buoy winds, we find an rms error wind component error of approximately 1.8 m . s(-1). These results show that the ASCAT wind product is of high quality and satisfies its wind component accuracy requirement of 2 m . s(-1).
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 395
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 554 ECMWF
  • [2] [Anonymous], 395 ECMWF
  • [3] Characterization of ASCAT measurements based on buoy and QuikSCAT wind vector observations
    Bentamy, A.
    Croize-Fillon, D.
    Perigaud, C.
    [J]. OCEAN SCIENCE, 2008, 4 (04) : 265 - 274
  • [4] The advanced scatterometer (ASCAT) on the meteorological operational (MetOp) platform:: A follow on for European wind scatterometers
    Figa-Saldaña, J
    Wilson, JJW
    Attema, E
    Gelsthorpe, R
    Drinkwater, MR
    Stoffelen, A
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 28 (03) : 404 - 412
  • [5] Freilich MH, 1999, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V16, P283, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<0283:SBBUOO>2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] An improved C-band scatterometer ocean geophysical model function: CMOD5
    Hersbach, H.
    Stoffelen, A.
    de Haan, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2007, 112 (C3)
  • [8] KLAES D, 2000, EUMEPSMISREQ93001 EU
  • [9] On Scatterometer Ocean Stress
    Portabella, M.
    Stoffelen, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 26 (02) : 368 - 382
  • [10] On Bayesian scatterometer wind inversion
    Stoffelen, A
    Portabella, M
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (06): : 1523 - 1533