Improvement of intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in prolonged cardiac surgery by automated alerts in the operating room

被引:54
作者
Zanetti, G [1 ]
Flanagan, HL
Cohn, LH
Giardina, R
Platt, R
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Dept Internal Med, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med,Channing Lab, Boston, MA USA
[3] CDC Eastern Massachusetts Prevent Epictr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg,Div Cardiac Surg, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ambulatory Care & Prevent, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Pilgrim Hlth Care, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/502109
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of an automated intra-operative alert to redose prophylactic antibiotics in prolonged cardiac operations. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded trial. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery that lasted more than 4 hours after the preoperative administration of cefazolin, unless they were receiving therapeutic antibiotics at the time of surgery. INTERVENTION: Randomization to an audible and visual reminder on the operating room computer console at 225 minutes after the administration of preoperative antibiotics (reminder group, n = 137) or control (n = 136). After another 30 minutes, the circulating nurse was required to indicate whether a follow-up dose of antibiotics had been administered. RESULTS: Intraoperative redosing was significantly more frequent in the reminder group (93 of 137; 68916) than in the control group (55 of 136; 40916) (adjusted odds ratio, 3.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.97 to 5.56; P < .0001). The impact of the reminder was even greater when compared with the 6 months preceding the study period (129 of 480; 27%; P < .001), suggesting some spillover effect on the control group. Redosing was formally declined for 19 of the 44 patients in the reminder group without redosing. The rate of surgical-site infection in the reminder group (5 of 137; 4%) was similar to that in the control group (8 of 136; 6%; P = .42), but significantly lower than that in the pre-study period (48 of 480; 10%; P = .02). CONCLUSION: The use of an automatic reminder system in the operating room improved compliance with guidelines on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 16
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
BARRIERE SL, 1992, CLIN PHARMACY, V11, P483
[2]  
COPPA GF, 1988, SURGERY, V104, P853
[3]   QUALITY STANDARD FOR ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN SURGICAL-PROCEDURES [J].
DELLINGER, EP ;
GROSS, PA ;
BARRETT, TL ;
KRAUSE, PJ ;
MARTONE, WJ ;
MCGOWAN, JE ;
SWEET, RL ;
WENZEL, RP .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1994, 18 (03) :422-427
[4]   CEFOXITIN VERSUS ERYTHROMYCIN, NEOMYCIN, AND CEFAZOLIN IN COLORECTAL OPERATIONS - IMPORTANCE OF THE DURATION OF THE SURGICAL-PROCEDURE [J].
KAISER, AB ;
HERRINGTON, JL ;
JACOBS, JK ;
MULHERIN, JL ;
ROACH, AC ;
SAWYERS, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1983, 198 (04) :525-530
[5]  
Kohn LT., 1999, ERR IS HUMAN BUILDIN
[6]   Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 [J].
Mangram, AJ ;
Horan, TC ;
Pearson, ML ;
Silver, LC ;
Jarvis, WR .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (04) :250-278
[7]  
MARTIN C, 1994, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V15, P463
[8]  
PAGE CP, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P410
[9]   RISK-FACTORS FOR INFECTION AT THE OPERATIVE SITE AFTER ABDOMINAL OR VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY [J].
SHAPIRO, M ;
MUNOZ, A ;
TAGER, IB ;
SCHOENBAUM, SC ;
POLK, BF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 307 (27) :1661-1666
[10]  
Zanetti G, 2001, EMERG INFECT DIS, V7, P828