A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine treatment in depressed outpatients

被引:46
作者
Nemeroff, Charles B.
Thase, Michael E.
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
major depressive disorder; antidepressants; fluoxetine; venlafaxine; norepinephrine; serotonin reuptake inhibitors;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.07.009
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared venlafaxine (immediate release), the first modern serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. Outpatients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with venlafaxine (75-225 mg/day; n = 102), fluoxetine (20-60 mg/day; n = 104), or placebo (n = 102). Efficacy was assessed using the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-21), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scale, response and remission rates, and several other measures. Intent-to-treat analyses utilized both the last observation carried forward and ETRANK methods to account for missing data. At week 6 or study endpoint, venlafaxine (mean dose: 142 mg/day) was superior to placebo on most outcomes measures, whereas the differences between fluoxetine (mean dose: 41 mg/day) and placebo were less consistent. Final remission (defined as HAM-D <= 7) rates were 32%, 28%, and 22% for venlafaxine, fluoxetine, and placebo, respectively. Few differences between the active treatments attained statistical significance. Both active therapies were generally well tolerated; however, attrition due to adverse events, incidence of selected side effects, and increases in pulse and blood pressure favored fluoxetine over venlafaxine. This study provides further evidence that venlafaxine is effective after 6 weeks of treatment compared with placebo. The efficacy profile of fluoxetine was somewhat less consistent. It is strongly recommended that future studies of comparative antidepressant efficacy be adequately powered to detect modest between-drug differences in efficacy. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 359
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ELKIN I, 1985, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V42, P305
[2]   VENLAFAXINE - A HETEROCYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANT [J].
ELLINGROD, VL ;
PERRY, PJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1994, 51 (24) :3033-3046
[3]  
ENTSUAH AR, 1990, THEORY METHOD, V19, P3859
[4]  
Entsuah R, 1996, J Biopharm Stat, V6, P457, DOI 10.1080/10543409608835156
[5]   VENLAFAXINE - A REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTIC POTENTIAL IN DEPRESSION [J].
HOLLIDAY, SM ;
BENFIELD, P .
DRUGS, 1995, 49 (02) :280-294
[6]   Symptom reduction and suicide risk in patients treated with placebo in antidepressant clinical trials - An analysis of the food and drug administration database [J].
Khan, A ;
Warner, HA ;
Brown, WA .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 57 (04) :311-317
[7]   Severity of depression and response to antidepressants and placebo: An analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database [J].
Khan, A ;
Leventhal, RM ;
Khan, SR ;
Brown, WA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 22 (01) :40-45
[8]  
KIRSCH I, 1998, UNPUB US FOOD DRUG A, V1
[9]   A MULTIPLE IMPUTATION STRATEGY FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH TRUNCATION OF PATIENT DATA [J].
LAVORI, PW ;
DAWSON, R ;
SHERA, D .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (17) :1913-1925
[10]   The effects of venlafaxine on social activity level in depressed outpatients [J].
Lenderking, WR ;
Tennen, H ;
Nackley, JF ;
Hale, MS ;
Turner, RR ;
Testa, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 60 (03) :157-163