Government institutions and the dynamics of urban growth in China

被引:39
作者
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres [1 ]
Zhang, Min [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, Dept Geog & Environm, London, England
[2] Soochow Univ, Dongwu Business Sch, Dept Publ Finance, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
China; cities; corruption; economic growth; government efficiency; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; QUALITY; CITIES; PERFORMANCE; REGIONS; AGGLOMERATION; EXTERNALITIES; TECHNOLOGY; CORRUPTION;
D O I
10.1111/jors.12435
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Economic growth in China in recent decades has largely rested on the dynamism of its cities. High economic growth has coincided with measures aimed at improving the efficiency of local governments and with a mounting political drive to curb corruption. Yet the connection between government institutions and urban growth in China remains poorly understood. This paper is the first to look into the link between government efficiency and corruption, on the one hand, and urban growth in China, on the other hand and to assess what is the role of institutions relative to more traditional factors for economic growth in Chinese cities. Using panel data for 283 cities over the period between 2003 and 2014, the results show that the urban growth in China is a consequence of a combination of favorable human capital, innovation, density, local conditions, foreign direct investment, and city-level government institutions. Both government quality-especially for those cities with the best governments-and the fight against corruption at the city level have a direct effect on urban growth. Measures to tackle corruption at the provincial level matter in a more indirect way, by raising or lowering the returns of other growth-inducing factors.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 668
页数:36
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Academy of Government Beijing Normal University & Policy Evaluation Center of Jiangxi Normal University, 2016, RES REP LOC GOV EFF
  • [2] The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation
    Acemoglu, D
    Johnson, S
    Robinson, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) : 1369 - 1401
  • [3] De facto political power and institutional persistence
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Robinson, James A.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (02) : 325 - 330
  • [4] WHAT MAKES CITIES MORE PRODUCTIVE? EVIDENCE FROM FIVE OECD COUNTRIES ON THE ROLE OF URBAN GOVERNANCE
    Ahrend, Rudiger
    Farchy, Emily
    Kaplanis, Ioannis
    Lembcke, Alexander C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (03) : 385 - 410
  • [5] ANNONI P., 2013, EU Regional Competitiveness Index, RCI 2013
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1999, The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2004, Handbook of regional and urban economics, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3, 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3]
  • [8] [Anonymous], HDB REGIONAL URBAN E
  • [9] Are Chinese cities too small?
    Au, Chun-Chung
    Henderson, J. Vernon
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2006, 73 (03) : 549 - 576
  • [10] Landscape Urbanization and Economic Growth in China: Positive Feedbacks and Sustainability Dilemmas
    Bai, Xuemei
    Chen, Jing
    Shi, Peijun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (01) : 132 - 139