Association of lower costs of pulsatile machine perfusion in renal transplantation from expanded criteria donors

被引:53
作者
Buchanan, P. M. [1 ]
Lentine, K. L. [1 ,2 ]
Burroughs, T. E. [1 ]
Schnitzler, M. A. [1 ]
Salvalaggio, P. R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Outcomes Res, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Div Nephrol, St Louis, MO USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
cost benefits; delayed graft function; expanded criteria donors; kidney transplantation; Medicare; pulsatile machine perfusion;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02412.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Pulsatile machine perfusion (PMP) has been shown to reduce delayed graft function (DGF) in expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. Here, we investigate whether there is a cost benefit associated with PMP utilization in ECD kidney transplants. We analyzed United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data describing Medicare-insured ECD kidney transplant recipients in 1995-2004 (N = 5840). We examined total Medicare payments for transplant hospitalization and annually for 3 years posttransplant according to PMP utilization. After adjusting for other recipient, donor and transplant factors, PMP utilization was associated with a $2130 reduction (p = 0.007) in hospitalization costs. PMP utilization was also associated with lower DGF risk (p < 0.0001). PMP utilization did not predict differences in rejection, graft survival, patient survival, or costs at 1, 2 and 3 years posttransplant. PMP utilization is correlated with lower costs for the transplant hospitalization, which is likely due to the associated reduction in DGF among recipients of PMP kidneys. However, there is no difference in long-term Medicare costs for ECD recipients by PMP utilization. A prospective trial is necessary as it will help determine if the associations seen here are due to PMP utilization and not differences in the population studied.
引用
收藏
页码:2391 / 2401
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ALMOND PS, 1991, TRANSPLANT P, V23, P1304
[2]   Isolation of swinholide A and related glycosylated derivatives from two field collections of marine cyanobacteria [J].
Andrianasolo, EH ;
Gross, H ;
Goeger, D ;
Musafija-Girt, M ;
McPhail, KP ;
Leal, RM ;
Mooberry, SL ;
Gerwick, WH .
ORGANIC LETTERS, 2005, 7 (07) :1375-1378
[3]   Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of delayed graft function in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients [J].
Irish, WD ;
Mccollum, DA ;
Tesi, RJ ;
Owen, AB ;
Brennan, DC ;
Bailly, JE ;
Schnitzler, MA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 (11) :2967-2974
[4]   Is pulsatile perfusion necessary for renal transplantation engrafting kidneys from cardiac death donors? [J].
Kusaka, M. ;
Kubota, Y. ;
Sasaki, H. ;
Maruyama, T. ;
Hayakawa, K. ;
Shiroki, R. ;
Hoshinaga, K. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (10) :3388-3389
[5]   Payment for living donor (vendor) kidneys: A cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Matas, AJ ;
Schnitzler, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (02) :216-221
[6]   Definition of expanded criteria donor and standard donor [J].
Matsuokaa, L ;
Shah, T ;
Aswad, S ;
Bunnapradist, S ;
Cho, Y ;
Mendez, RG ;
Mendez, R ;
Selby, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (06) :1473-1478
[7]   Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation [J].
Merion, RM ;
Ashby, VB ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Distant, DA ;
Hulbert-Shearon, TE ;
Metzger, RA ;
Ojo, AO ;
Port, FK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (21) :2726-2733
[8]   The influence of pulsatile preservation in kidney transplantation from non-heart-beating donors [J].
Moustafellos, P. ;
Hadjianastassiou, V. ;
Roy, D. ;
Muktadir, A. ;
Contractor, H. ;
Vaidya, A. ;
Friend, P. J. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (05) :1323-1325
[9]   Use of perfusion parameters in predicting outcomes of machine-preserved kidneys [J].
Mozes, MF ;
Skolek, RB ;
Korf, BC .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (01) :350-351
[10]   A comparison of renal preservation by cold storage and machine perfusion using a porcine autotransplant model [J].
Nicholson, ML ;
Hosgood, SA ;
Metcalfe, MS ;
Waller, JR ;
Brook, NR .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (03) :333-337