New immunochemical fecal occult blood test with two-consecutive stool sample testing is a cost-effective approach for colon cancer screening: Results of a prospective multicenter study in Chinese patients

被引:37
作者
Li, Shirong
Wang, Huahong
Hu, Jichun
Li, Nan
Liu, Yulan
Wu, Zitao
Zheng, Yue
Wang, Honghua
Wu, Kai
Ye, Hui
Rao, Jianyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Army Gen Hosp, Ctr Colon Dis, Dept Gastroenterol, Beijing 100700, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ, First Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Haidian Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Hosp Peoples Liberat Army 390, Dept Gastroenterol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Univ, Second Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
colon cancer; fecal occult blood test; screening;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.21774
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study is to evaluate a new immunochemical fecal occult blood test method (Hemosure IFOBT), and compare it to the Guaiac-based chemical method (CFOBT) for colorectal cancer detection. A hypothetical sequential method (SFOBT), in which IFOBT was used only as a confirmatory test for CFOBT, was also evaluated. A total of 324 patients were recruited from 5 major hospitals in Beijing, China. For each patient, 3 consecutive stool samples were collected for simultaneous CFOBT and IFOBT tests, followed by colonoscopic examination. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the 3 methods (CFOBT, IFOBT and SFOBT) in two settings, with the first 2 consecutive samples versus all 3 samples. Although the sensitivity for the detection of cancer and large (> 20 mm) or multiple adenoma was similar for all 3 methods in the three-sample setting, in the two-sample setting IFOBT had higher sensitivity than SFOBT for detecting cancer (87.8% vs. 75.5%, respectively, p < 0.05) and large (> 20 min) or multiple adenomas (65.4% vs. 42.3%, respectively, p < 0.05). The IFOBT also had a higher specificity than the CFOBT (89.2% vs. 75.5%, respectively, p < 0.01) in '' normal '' individuals defined by colonoscopy in the three-sample setting. Comparing two-sample setting to the three-sample setting, both CFOBT and SFOBT showed significant loss of sensitivity for the detection of cancer as well as adenoma, whereas the sensitivity for IFOBT did not change significantly. Overall, IFOBT with two-sample testing showed compatible sensitivity and specificity to the three-sample testing, and had a lower relative cost per cancer detected than the three-sample testing. In conclusion, the new Hemosure IFOBT with two consecutive stool samples appears to be the most cost-effective approach for colon cancer screening. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:3078 / 3083
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
GAO YT, 2000, CHINESE J ONCOL, V22, P263
[2]  
Greenberg PD, 2000, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V95, P1331
[3]   Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer [J].
Hardcastle, JD ;
Chamberlain, JO ;
Robinson, MHE ;
Moss, SM ;
Amar, SS ;
Balfour, TW ;
James, PD ;
Mangham, CM .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9040) :1472-1477
[4]   A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds [J].
Jorgensen, OD ;
Kronborg, O ;
Fenger, C .
GUT, 2002, 50 (01) :29-32
[5]   Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test [J].
Kronborg, O ;
Fenger, C ;
Olsen, J ;
Jorgensen, OD ;
Sondergaard, O .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9040) :1467-1471
[6]  
Li SR, 2003, CHINESE MED J-PEKING, V116, P200
[7]  
LI SR, 1993, CHINESE J ONCOL, V15, P230
[8]  
Li SR, 2004, WORLD CHINESE J DIGE, V12, P137
[9]  
LI SR, 1990, CHINESE GERONTOL J M, V9, P152
[10]  
LU YM, 1997, CHIN J DIG ENDOSCOPE, V14, P222