The global signal of the 11-year solar cycle in the stratosphere: observations and models

被引:64
作者
Labitzke, K
Austin, J
Butchart, N
Knight, J
Takahashi, M
Nakamoto, M
Nagashima, T
Haigh, J
Williams, V
机构
[1] Met Off, Bracknell RG12 2SZ, Berks, England
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Meteorol, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Tokyo, Ctr Climate Syst Res, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2BZ, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
11-year solar cycle; stratosphere; general circulation models;
D O I
10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00084-0
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The global signal of the 11-year solar cycle in the stratosphere: observations and models Earlier studies used the data from four solar cycles, to examine the global structure of the signal of the 11-year sunspot cycle (SSC) in the stratosphere and troposphere, using correlations between the solar cycle and heights and temperatures at different pressure levels. Here, this work is expanded in Part I to show the differences of geopotential heights and temperatures between maxima and minima of the SSC. This study puts the earlier work on a firmer ground and gives quantitative values for comparisons with models. In Part II, two general circulation models (GCMs) with coupled stratospheric chemistry are used to simulate the impact of changes in solar output. This paper is not intended as a review of the whole topic of solar impacts, but provides some results recently obtained in observations and modelling. Comparisons between the GCM results and observations show that the differences between solar maximum and solar minimum for temperature and ozone are generally smaller than observed. In the middle and upper stratosphere, models are closer to agreeing with observations of temperature, but a significant observed temperature difference near 100 hPa is not reproduced in the models. Also, model predictions of the shape of the vertical profile of the ozone difference do not agree with observations and the comparisons are hindered by large statistical uncertainties in both models and observations. Nonetheless, the results are an improvement on 2-D model results in showing a larger ozone signal in the lower stratosphere. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 210
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Austin J, 2002, J ATMOS SCI, V59, P218, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0218:ATDCCC>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   Effects of solar cycle variability on the lower stratosphere anti the troposphere [J].
Balachandran, NK ;
Rind, D ;
Lonergan, P ;
Shindell, DT .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D22) :27321-27339
[4]   The impact of solar variability on climate [J].
Haigh, JD .
SCIENCE, 1996, 272 (5264) :981-984
[5]   The solar cycle variation of total ozone: Dynamical forcing in the lower stratosphere [J].
Hood, LL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D1) :1355-1370
[6]  
HOOD LL, 2001, P SPARC 2000 M MAR P
[7]  
Kalnay E, 1996, B AM METEOROL SOC, V77, P437, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TROPOSPHERE AND STRATOSPHERE ON A DECADAL SCALE [J].
LABITZKE, K ;
VANLOON, H .
TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1995, 47 (02) :275-286
[10]   The QBO effect on the solar signal in the global stratosphere in the winter of the Northern Hemisphere [J].
Labitzke, K ;
van Loon, H .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2000, 62 (08) :621-628