Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire

被引:46
作者
Brodersen, John [1 ]
Thorsen, Hanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept & Res Unit Gen Practice, Ctr Hlth & Soc, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Breast neoplasms; false positive reactions; focus groups; mass screening; psychometrics; questionnaires; translating;
D O I
10.1080/02813430802542508
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. The aims of the study were to translate and adapt both the negative and positive items of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ) into Danish and to test the translated version for comprehension, suitability, and content coverage by developing new items in a setting of false-positive screening mammography. Design. The translation was carried out following an internationally accepted method involving two panels: bilingual and lay. Subjects. The suitability and the content coverage of the PCQ were tested in six group interviews. Participants in the interviews were women who had had a false-positive screening mammography. They were grouped according to additional examinations they experienced following abnormal screening mammography. The audio-recordings from the group interviews were thematically analysed to identify the key consequences of abnormal and false-positive screening mammography. Results. Fifteen new items were generated to cover the negative psychosocial consequences of abnormal and false-positive screening mammography comprehensively. Five new items were produced that concerned the consequences of screening mammography during the period after being declared free from suspicion of cancer. Three items from the PCQ were deleted because they were judged by interviewees to be irrelevant. Response options for the positive items were changed to allow responses in both positive and negative directions. Conclusion. Because of the major changes to both parts of the PCQ the measure derived from this study should be regarded as a new questionnaire with two parts: Consequences Of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC). Part II focuses on the long-term consequences of a false-positive screening mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 256
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials [J].
Acquadro, Catherine ;
Conway, Katrin ;
Hareendran, Asha ;
Aaronson, Neil .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) :509-521
[2]   The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review [J].
Brett, J ;
Bankhead, C ;
Henderson, B ;
Watson, E ;
Austoker, J .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 14 (11) :917-938
[3]   Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment [J].
Brett, J ;
Austoker, J ;
Ong, G .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1998, 20 (04) :396-403
[4]   Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance [J].
Brett, J ;
Austoker, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 2001, 23 (04) :292-300
[5]   The adequacy of measurement of short and long-term consequences of false-positive screening mammography [J].
Brodersen, J ;
Thorsen, H ;
Cockburn, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2004, 11 (01) :39-44
[6]  
Brodersen J, 2006, MEASURING PSYCHOSOCI
[7]   Validation of a condition-specific measure for women having an abnormal screening mammography [J].
Brodersen, John ;
Thorsen, Hanne ;
Kreiner, Svend .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (04) :294-304
[8]   DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE PCQ - A QUESTIONNAIRE TO MEASURE THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
COCKBURN, J ;
DELUISE, T ;
HURLEY, S ;
CLOVER, K .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1992, 34 (10) :1129-1134
[9]   Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods [J].
Collins, D .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (03) :229-238
[10]   Requirements for quality of life instruments in clinical research [J].
Doward, LC ;
Meads, DM ;
Thorsen, H .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 :S13-S16