Morbidity of flank incision for renal donors

被引:27
作者
Duque, JLF [1 ]
Loughlin, KR [1 ]
Kumar, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Surg,Div Urol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00274-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To analyze the short and long-term morbidity of flank incision in renal donors. The flank incision has been widely used by urologists for decades, and its morbidity has always been an issue. Methods, A questionnaire assessing the morbidity and quality of life was sent to the last 100 living donors at our institution. All operations had been performed through the flank approach. Fifty-two questionnaires were returned. The mean age was 45 years. The mean follow-up was 29.5 months (range 7 to 58). The questionnaire was composed of questions regarding pain, cosmesis of the incision, and quality-of-life issues after surgery. Results. No patients had any major postoperative complications. Pain was described in the first postoperative day as severe, moderate, or mild by 36 (69.3%), 6 (11.5%), and 10 (19.2%) patients, respectively. On the day of discharge (mean 4 days), 17 patients (32.7%) reported severe pain. Pain was completely or somewhat controlled with analgesics after surgery in all but 3 patients. Most (81%) discontinued pain medication by the end of fourth postoperative week (54% by the end of second week). Only 3 patients (5.8%) related being very bothered by the incision at the time of the questionnaire. Bother relates to pain, location, length, and unsightliness of scar. In 45 patients (83%), the incision did not impact negatively on their self-esteem and quality of life, and 93% of patients in retrospect would undergo the same procedure without any reservation. Conclusions. The short and long-term morbidity of the flank incision for living donor nephrectomy is acceptable. Most patients are content after the kidney donation, and all would undergo the same procedure all over again, the vast majority without any reservation. UROLOGY 54: 796-801, 1999. (C) 1999, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:796 / 801
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BARRY JM, 1992, CAMPBELLS UROLOGY, P2501
[2]   LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY - COMPLICATION RATES IN 490 CONSECUTIVE CASES [J].
BLOHME, I ;
FEHRMAN, I ;
NORDEN, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1992, 26 (02) :149-153
[3]   The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? [J].
Collins, SL ;
Moore, RA ;
McQuay, HJ .
PAIN, 1997, 72 (1-2) :95-97
[4]   LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY - FACTORS INFLUENCING MORBIDITY [J].
DEMARCO, T ;
AMIN, M ;
HARTY, JI ;
LAWSON, RK .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (06) :1082-1083
[5]   Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy [J].
Flowers, JL ;
Jacobs, S ;
Cho, E ;
Morton, A ;
Rosenberger, WF ;
Evans, D ;
Imbembo, AL ;
Bartlett, ST .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 226 (04) :483-489
[6]   Endoscopy-assisted live donor nephrectomy: Comparison between laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic procedures [J].
Ishikawa, A ;
Suzuki, K ;
Saisu, K ;
Kageyama, S ;
Ushiyama, T ;
Fujita, K .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (01) :165-167
[7]  
Jacobs Stephen C., 1997, Journal of Urology, V157, P429
[8]   THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE - ITS USE IN PAIN MEASUREMENT [J].
LANGLEY, GB ;
SHEPPEARD, H .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 1985, 5 (04) :145-148
[9]  
Lowell J A, 1994, Semin Urol, V12, P102
[10]   REVIEW OF 333 LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMIES [J].
OTTELIN, MC ;
BUESCHEN, AJ ;
LLOYD, LK ;
JOSEPH, DB ;
DIETHELM, AG ;
BURNS, JR .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 87 (01) :61-64