What does self rated health measure? Results from the British Whitehall II and French Gazel cohort studies

被引:330
作者
Singh-Manoux, A
Martikainen, P
Ferrie, J
Zins, M
Marmot, M
Goldberg, M
机构
[1] HNSM, INSERM, U687, F-94415 St Maurice, France
[2] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Sociol, Populat Res Unit, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.2005.039883
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the determinants of self rated health (SRH) in men and women in the British Whitehall II study and the French Gazel cohort study. Methods: The cross sectional analyses reported in this paper use data from wave 1 of the Whitehall II study ( 1985 - 88) and wave 2 of the Gazel study ( 1990). Determinants were either self reported or obtained through medical screening and employer's records. The Whitehall II study is based on 20 civil service departments located in London. The Gazel study is based on employees of France's national gas and electricity company (EDF-GDF). SRH data were available on 6889 men and 3403 women in Whitehall II and 13 008 men and 4688 women in Gazel. Results: Correlation analysis was used to identify determinants of SRH from 35 measures in Whitehall II and 33 in Gazel. Stepwise multiple regressions identified five determinants ( symptom score, sickness absence, longstanding illness, minor psychiatric morbidity, number of recurring health problems) in Whitehall II, explaining 34.7% of the variance in SRH. In Gazel, four measures ( physical tiredness, number of health problems in the past year, physical mobility, number of prescription drugs used) explained 41.4% of the variance in SRH. Conclusion: Measures of mental and physical health status contribute most to the SRH construct. The part played by age, early life factors, family history, sociodemographic variables, psychosocial factors, and health behaviours in these two occupational cohorts is modest.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 372
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Self-rated health and mortality in a Lithuanian and a Dutch population [J].
Appels, A ;
Bosma, H ;
Grabauskas, V ;
Gostautas, A ;
Sturmans, F .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1996, 42 (05) :681-689
[2]   Self-reported health and adult mortality risk: An analysis of cause-specific mortality [J].
Benjamins, MR ;
Hummer, RA ;
Eberstein, IW ;
Nam, CB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2004, 59 (06) :1297-1306
[3]   Community studies reporting association between self-rated health and mortality - Additional studies, 1995 to 1998 [J].
Benyamini, Y ;
Idler, EL .
RESEARCH ON AGING, 1999, 21 (03) :392-401
[4]   Gender differences in the self-rated health-mortality association: Is it poor self-rated health that predicts mortality or excellent self-rated health that predicts survival? [J].
Benyamini, Y ;
Blumstein, T ;
Lusky, A ;
Modan, B .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2003, 43 (03) :396-405
[5]   Social class and self-rated health: can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment? [J].
Borg, V ;
Kristensen, TS .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (07) :1019-1030
[6]  
Bradburn N.M., 1969, STRUCTURE PSYCHOL WE
[7]   Self rated health:: Is it as good a predictor of subsequent mortality among adults in lower as well as in higher social classes? [J].
Burström, B ;
Fredlund, P .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 55 (11) :836-840
[8]   The European health divide: a matter of financial or social capital? [J].
Carlson, P .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2004, 59 (09) :1985-1992
[9]  
Cohen J., 1983, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES
[10]   Proposed Hostility and Pharisaic - Virtue Scales for the MMPI [J].
Cook, Walter W. ;
Medley, Donald M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 38 (06) :414-418